Thank you.
I'll get to the question that I wanted to talk about in the first place.
On this Senate amendment and the addition of “making”, I was a bit confused, so I want some clarification.
It would seem to me that if you were making nuclear material or a nuclear device, you would obviously be in possession of it. That is what was assumed with the original wording. However, I can see a situation in which perhaps you are in possession of such material that you didn't actually make; the person who did make it may have then passed it along.
For greater clarity, is that the reason, or part of the reason, that the minister agreed with the amendment to include “making”?