What I would say is this: we're hypothesizing a situation where you have someone who has served 25 years in the penitentiary and is remorseful, has admitted culpability for their offence, has engaged undoubtedly in extensive treatment and rehabilitative efforts, and has been determined by the parole board not to pose a substantial risk to the community, and who's then not going to be set free, see you later; the person's going to be under extremely intensive supervision for many years after they would initially get some form of parole, and supervision for the rest of their lives. I don't know if I entirely agree with the characterization that it's a situation where a person is just going to be let out the door because the parole board decides after 25 years that they're good to go.
On February 23rd, 2015. See this statement in context.