Okay. In terms of the independent advisory board, you quite rightly point out that they will intake, through an open application process, qualified candidates and they have the ability to seek out other qualified candidates to put their names forward.
What the Prime Minister has done in the mandate letter and the terms of reference is task the board with looking at the assessment criteria that have been articulated and coming up with a short list of three to five names. Once the committee has come up with a short list of three to five names, that is the point at which I will take the list and engage in a series of consultations.
Certainly, as I stated, I will consult with Chief Justice McLachlin of the Supreme Court. I will consult and have discussions with the relevant Attorneys General on the short list. I will have conversations with justice critics. I will have discussions with members of this committee and the senate committee on constitutional and legal affairs. I will ensure, based on discussions, that I am able to recognize the balance that needs to be drawn between transparency and the necessary realities of privacy and the protection of privacy in terms of individuals who will be on that short list. I look forward to having those extensive discussions and ensuring that the recommendations that I make to the Prime Minister are based on those discussions in terms of the short list.