Evidence of meeting #18 for National Defence in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was information.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

John Forster  Chief, Communications Security Establishment
Kevin Lindsey  Assistant Deputy Minister, Chief Financial Officer, Finance and Corporate Services, Department of National Defence
Patrick Finn  Chief of Staff, Materiel Group, Department of National Defence

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

No, we would have the technical assistance—

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

You would not say it because it's not true or you wouldn't say it because you're not going to tell us?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

No, sir, we would provide technical assistance to them. It could range from computer assistance to collection to other aspects they would need for their investigation, and it would be done lawfully under their authority and their warrant.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

You're acting under their warrants, but you could actually do the technical accessing of the private information.

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

Only if they've gone to court and got a warrant—

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

No, we're already in court now, we've got a warrant, and they're coming to you for assistance.

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

It's their operation, their authority, and we would provide some technical assistance.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

Okay, but the nature of that technical assistance is what I'm interested in. What I'm asking you is whether you are able to use your technical capabilities, to actually intercept private communications on the existing networks of Bell Canada or Telus or Rogers or any of these networks. Is that the case?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

No, we would have to do that only through them, through their assistance, with the telecommunications companies. They would approach this.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

So you don't actually collect the information on their behalf through your systems?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

It depends what the particular case is.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

So you do?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

I said it depends what...you'd need to give me a specific, sir.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

Well, we were talking about an intercept warrant, which requires the interception of private communications. You would actually do the work with your equipment, is that the case?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

No, it may be helping them with forensics on a piece of computer equipment that the RCMP has obtained under warrant. It could be a range of technical assistance.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

Are you saying, no, you don't actually do the interceptions yourself under their warrants?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

Again, if they have the lawful authority, they would go to a telecommunications company and say, “We have a court order to access this information.” They may need our assistance with encryption. They may need our assistance with forensics on a computer drive. It could be a range of technical assistance.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

But they don't use your access to those services?

12:45 p.m.

Chief, Communications Security Establishment

John Forster

They use our technical assistance; that's all I can tell you at this point.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Ms. Michaud.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Peter Kent

Barely 30 seconds....

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Élaine Michaud NDP Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

I'll be very quick.

My question is for the Department of National Defence officials.

Coming back quickly to supplementary estimates (C), I saw that DND was transferring $25,000 to the National Research Council of Canada for the assessment, management and remediation of federal contaminated sites. Could you please provide to the committee, in writing, the details on how that money is being used?

In my riding, Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, there are TCE-contaminated sites in Shannon caused by the Valcartier military base. Although federal money is earmarked for the cleanup, there is very little of it and it isn't accessible quickly enough.

So I'd like to have the details on how that $25,000 is being used and see whether it includes the cleanup in Shannon.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Peter Kent

A very brief answer, please.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Élaine Michaud NDP Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Actually, since the witnesses won't have enough time to give me the details now, I'd just like the answer in writing.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Peter Kent

So yes or no?