Evidence of meeting #54 for National Defence in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was camera.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Melissa Radford  Committee Researcher

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

She's just qualifying the statement.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

I am not changing the intent.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

She's not changing it.

You're qualifying it. I understand.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

It's her right to do that.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

That's right.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

All right, that's on the table.

Is there more discussion?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

I like it.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

I'm going to call a vote then, if there's no discussion.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Leona Alleslev Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

I'm sorry, I don't understand it.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

She's basically—

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Leona Alleslev Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

So if the ombudsman says he wants it public, then there's no meeting. If he wants it public—

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

That's right.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Leona Alleslev Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

—then he's the deciding factor in whether or not to hold a public meeting.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

I think the intent is that if we call the ombudsman here, just knowing the guy, he's going to come here. We can call him here because we're the committee. What you're trying to suggest, I think, if I get this right, is that he'll decide whether he wants this in camera or not.

If he says he wants it to be public—

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Darren Fisher Liberal Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

That's right.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

—then we would still have the meeting. He would get the invitation. We would leave the in camera piece at the discretion of the ombudsman, if I have that correct.

Okay, that's what we're voting on.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Darren Fisher Liberal Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

I agree with you.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

If I understand correctly, Mr. Chair, based on the advice you received from the clerk, what Ms. Gallant is adding is a qualifier at the end as to whether or not it's in camera.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

The problem, as Leona pointed out, is that qualifier is actually whether or not the meeting would take place.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

That's not what—

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

I think we all know what the intent is, but we seem to be voting on something we already voted on.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Right. I'm going to—

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

I'm going to give you the wording.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

Sure, give me the words.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

To add, after the word “report”, “in camera or in public at the discretion of the ombudsman”.