I think if Mr. Cullen checks his schedule we had three and a half meetings with witnesses on this issue. We're now into our fourth meeting in terms of clause-by-clause. I may be forgetting, I'm not sure, but that doubles the amount of meetings that actually fulfills what he asked for, which was the three meetings for witnesses. It doubles that, as we've done four meetings already in terms of clause-by-clause. I think he's gotten far more than he negotiated.
I think it's probably inappropriate for him to make light of the notion of good faith and talk about perversion of responsibility when he made an agreement with us. We voted together, as Mr. Regan pointed out. That agreement was put in place. If he wants out of it I guess he can choose to do that, but we were clear and we were precise when we made that motion that day. It can't be much clearer than it is in the book. If he wants to expand the study beyond what we agreed to, I guess he has the ability to do that.