Last question. Could those assets, then, be a contract for the provision of power? We've seen in feed-in tariffs and laws that a contract to a company for so many megawatts over so much time is seen as an asset, in court certainly. I guess what I'm trying to understand is this. When a company goes to seek its insurance out—and I want to know where the 50% limit is as well—you're saying a nuclear provider can get half of its $650 million out of the promise of other assets. So could it be the contract they have with Ontario Power?
On December 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.