Evidence of meeting #23 for Official Languages in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was tests.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Christine Holke
Lucie Lecomte  Committee Researcher
David Manicom  Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic and Program Policy, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Corinne Prince-St-Amand  Director General, Integration and Foreign Credentials Referral Office, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Stefanie Beck  Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate Services, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Donald Cochrane  Senior Director, International Region, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Well, I'd like to know in general terms.

10:35 a.m.

Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic and Program Policy, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

David Manicom

As a general rule, the people take the test before submitting their application, because the test results are part of the application.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Quickly, I'd like—

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

One moment, please. I want to clarify. Do you want to know the critical path in that regard?

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Yes, if that's the appropriate term.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Critical path means the way the person prepares the application, and the way it moves forward.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Exactly. I would like to know, essentially—

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

It's the critical path.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

It's one of the reasons the committee is considering the question at this time. What is the critical path, as you call it, for someone who wants to live in Canada? What are the reasons for his choice? At some point, I presume the person has choices to make, and decides to go right or left.

10:35 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate Services, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

It would be interesting to know that.

I have another question, and it's for Mr. Cochrane this time.

You haven't spoken yet. I think it's important for each witness to be able to express himself or herself. You are the senior director for the international region. What exactly does that mean? What role are you playing in relation to our study?

And you can speak English; that's not a problem.

10:35 a.m.

Donald Cochrane Senior Director, International Region, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

I will respond in English.

The international network of CIC oversees the visa offices overseas that deliver our program, which includes, in the instance of official languages, the promotion and recruitment of French-speaking individuals who might wish to go to communities outside of Quebec.

There is a major initiative done every year from our embassy in Paris. There are also some other embassies that conduct some promotion recruitment activities. Destination Canada is the largest such activity that we carry out.

We have a network of visa offices overseas. Obviously we have offices in areas where the tendency for immigration is higher than from other parts of the world. The areas of most concern for this committee would be the visa office in Paris, as well as the offices in the Maghrib area and sub-Saharan Africa, particularly western Africa.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Thanks very much.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Mr. Chair, if possible, I'd like a document that explains exactly what Destination Canada is. There have been several references to it, so I'd like the explanatory documents on the subject to be submitted to our committee this morning.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Very well. That will be a document we'll need to receive.

Ms. Boucher is requesting the floor for one minute, to address a specific point.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d’Orléans—Charlevoix, QC

Just a short minute.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

And then, I will give the floor to Mr. Samson.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

Darrell Samson Liberal Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook, NS

Okay.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d’Orléans—Charlevoix, QC

Considerable time was spent discussing solutions for the French test, which is apparently long and painful. With the technology we have today, such as iPads, iPhones and other digital technology, isn't it possible to have people take the test online?

10:35 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate Services, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Stefanie Beck

We would very much like that to be possible. What worries us about such a test is program integrity. How can we know it's the actual applicant who took the test and pressed the button? As long as we're not able to confirm the identity of the applicant who took the test, we can't be sure we have the correct result for the correct candidate. It's an avenue we're exploring, and we would very much like to be able to use it.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d’Orléans—Charlevoix, QC

That makes sense.

Thank you.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Many thanks.

Mr. Rioux, you have the floor.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

Jean Rioux Liberal Saint-Jean, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair. And I thank the witnesses for being with us.

I have three questions for you, and time is limited.

My first question is about the cost of the tests. Is it possible to grant a subsidy to a person who is applying to immigrate to Canada, in order to cover the difference between the cost of the English test and the cost of the French test?

My second question is about the goal of increasing immigration to minority communities outside Quebec by 4%. This increase is important to the survival of minority communities outside Quebec, but it's also important for Quebec's profile, because, when French outside Quebec has the opportunity to grow, it also helps ensure our overall survival. I acknowledge there's a problem in that regard. Are the objectives not being attained because you have a resource problem?

My third and last question is about host groups in the different provinces. Does the department offer financial support to these groups, to help them welcome immigrants well?

I invite you to provide a brief answer to each of those three questions.

10:40 a.m.

Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic and Program Policy, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

David Manicom

To answer your first question, we're assessing the possibility of granting a subsidy. However, it's very complicated, because a lot of people ask to take the test, but don't submit their immigration application. There are also people who take the test, but whose immigration application is rejected. Moreover, the price difference varies by country and even by city.

There are cities where the French test is more expensive. The administration of this matter is complex, even nightmarish, but we consider it one of the possible solutions.

10:40 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate Services, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Stefanie Beck

I will also try to be brief.

The 4% target is for 2018. We haven't yet met the objective, but it doesn't mean we won't achieve it in 2018. What more can we do on the subject? When we study the immigration continuum, we see that not enough francophones are submitting an application?

The problem is not to know where the new immigrant will settle if his or her application is accepted. The problem is finding the means to improve the francophone immigration rate in Canada, because we don't receive enough applications. In fact, that's why we have increased our efforts abroad. We observed a 2% to 3% increase in Express Entry and even 4%, the last time we sent out an invitation to francophones interested in immigrating to Canada.

How does one incentivize francophone immigrants to settle in francophone minority communities? It takes a lot of publicity. We use videos, seminars, webinars and other similar products to get francophone immigrants interested in living in French in communities outside Quebec where we need more francophones. We aren't having enough children in Canada.

I give the floor to Ms. Prince-St-Amand.