It's not a charter case, but the ruling is still indicative and useful for the debate. We have a question of whether a loss of control over internal affairs would undermine the ability of a union to present a united front to employers and pursue the collective interests of their members.
I think this would undermine the ability of the union to represent its members, because we'd be divulging internal information to the very people they're supposed to be protecting their members from.
I don't agree with this bill, and if we go back to the criteria, I think it's a clear violation of freedom of association.