I want to raise a concern that was just brought to my attention about the NDAs.
It is possible and perhaps likely—particularly if this motion isn't passed with unanimity—that a member could take this before the House as a question of privilege. They could say their parliamentary privileges are being clipped or curtailed by being required to sign an NDA in order to fulfill their parliamentary functions on this committee. This is something members need to consider.
I'm also going to highlight that in Westminster, a member of the House of Lords broke an NDA, but because he had parliamentary immunity there were no repercussions for him.
One question I have not yet had to address, but which I'm going to ask the clerk to look into, is about the review of these pre-determined Government of Canada locations. My question is simply, what's wrong with Parliament?
I will now return to the speaking order.
Mr. Fragiskatos, you have the floor.