This is just something that may have been missed, not to comment on the suggestion that we are all automatons of the minister's office. I would just like to go through proposed subsection 91.2(3), which says:
A decision-maker may not refuse to hear a complaint or grievance that would result in irreparable, significant or adverse consequences.
So there is a protection there.
The next protection I noticed is in proposed section 91.3, where it says:
A vexatious complainant...may seek judicial review of this designation.
There is actually an appeal process so that if someone disagrees with the vexatious complaint nomenclature, they can appeal, and there is a provision that sets out in legislation an offender's right to seek the review of the commissioner's decision to designate him or her a vexatious complainant in Federal Court.
If you wanted to you could expand on that, or perhaps you actually have covered that particular part of it.