Evidence of meeting #151 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was data.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Naaman Sugrue
Michele Mosca  Director, Quantum-Safe Canada
Brian O'Higgins  Chair, Quantum-Safe Canada
Christopher Parsons  Research Associate, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Citizen Lab
Karen McCrimmon  Kanata—Carleton, Lib.
Jim Eglinski  Yellowhead, CPC
Normand Lafrenière  President, Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies
Steve Masnyk  Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

5:30 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

I'm not a cyber expert or a tech expert. You'd probably have to have somebody a lot more intelligent on that matter.

5:30 p.m.

Kanata—Carleton, Lib.

Karen McCrimmon

Other countries have adopted this open banking. They must have protections in place.

5:30 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

Most of the European countries that have adopted this have a unitary state of government, so there is no arbitrage between provincial and federal. The rules that apply across the country for banks, for APIs and for fintechs would apply to the entire country. They don't have federations, basically.

5:30 p.m.

Kanata—Carleton, Lib.

Karen McCrimmon

It's a challenge, no doubt about that.

5:30 p.m.

President, Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

Normand Lafrenière

Most fintechs are provincially incorporated and they're not regulated. It will be a new world in terms of whether they need to be regulated and by whom.

5:30 p.m.

Kanata—Carleton, Lib.

5:30 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

There is an example in the U.K.—

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Mrs. McCrimmon, you have 15 seconds left.

5:30 p.m.

Kanata—Carleton, Lib.

Karen McCrimmon

That's good. Thank you.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Just before I go to Mr. Eglinski, which study are you referring to? Is it a finance committee study, or is it the department's study on this issue?

5:30 p.m.

President, Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

Normand Lafrenière

The department has consultations.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Okay.

5:30 p.m.

President, Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

Normand Lafrenière

It is the department that has asked for the consultations. They have put together a committee that looks—

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Is there any publication from that study?

5:30 p.m.

President, Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Okay.

Mr. Eglinski.

5:30 p.m.

Yellowhead, CPC

Jim Eglinski

I am going to refer my questions over to Mr. MacKenzie.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Mr. MacKenzie, welcome to the committee, again.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

Thank you, Chair. Yes, I'm brand new.

Thank you to the witnesses for being here.

One of the interesting things.... You're talking about the mutuals, and I think they are an important part of the whole equation, but there is a bigger picture of insurance companies also. I know that what you're talking about is more the liabilities insurance coverage with the mutuals, but I look at some of the big insurance companies, such as Sun Life or Manulife, and they get into quasi-financial services, or certainly mortgages and all those things.

The sharing of this information and the tying of services from a financial institution, such as a bank, to those types of insurance companies would open up a great deal of consumer information to those insurance agencies. Would that be a fair assessment?

5:35 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

I'll try to answer the question.

The prohibition is on banks doing insurance, not on insurance companies doing banking products, so it's a one-way street. The reason for that prohibition being a one-way street is that banks are in the credit-granting business. Credit is a very powerful tool. Credit can be used to coerce a consumer to buy other products based on that very powerful tool of using credit, so the prohibition is a one-way street.

You mentioned Manulife. Manulife does have a bank, and that bank follows the same rules as the big five banks.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

Do they have a bank, or are they associated with a bank to do their banking in?

5:35 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

They have a bank. I believe it's called Manulife Bank or Manulife One. I'm not too sure of the name.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

There are some that are out there now that call themselves banks, but I think they are associated through one of the chartered banks.

Anyway, all that aside, the other part is that when we look at the banks, I think almost all of them are also located in other countries. Most of them are in the United States; some are in South America, and some are in Europe. When information gets into a Canadian bank that has affiliates in other countries that may or may not have the same rules for insurance, do you see that as an issue?

5:35 p.m.

Principal, SkyBridge Strategies

Steve Masnyk

It's up to the jurisdiction that they operate in. Canadian banks operate in Canada under Canadian law. A Canadian bank operating in the United States would operate under U.S. law or state law.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

I don't disagree with you there, but the access to the information might very well also be available to the bank's offshore facilities, if that's what you would call it.

TD Canada Trust is probably the best-known in Canada and the U.S. Their branches are—