Evidence of meeting #48 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was information.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Nancy Miles  Senior Legal Counsel, Privy Council Office
Allen Sutherland  Assistant Secretary, Machinery of Government, Privy Council Office
Heather Sheehy  Director of Operations, Machinery of Government, Privy Council Office
John Davies  Director General, National Security Policy, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

Yes. I move that Bill C-22, in clause 21, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 9 with the following:

of the first 30 days on which that House is sitting after a

In essence, it's just to ensure that the report is tabled as soon as it's practical to do so.

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

So you're changing it from 45 days to 30 days.

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

Yes, that's correct.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Could I just ask, Chair, when was this amendment tabled?

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

I would have to ask the clerk.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Why do I have copies of LIB-14, but not LIB-13 in my package?

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dianne Lynn Watts Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

It's right here.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

I have it, sorry. Never mind.

(Amendment agreed to)

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

We have another one, LIB-14. Can someone move that?

Ms. Damoff.

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

I'm not going to read all of this into the record, but in essence what it does is the report that is tabled in the House will also be referred to either the Senate Standing Committee on National Security and Defence, or some other name, as it may be named later, and the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security of the House. It came up in testimony that it would be advisable for that report to be tabled with the appropriate committee, so it amends the bill to have that done.

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clause 21 as amended agreed to)

(On clause 22)

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

I believe there's an NDP amendment, NDP-10.

Mr. Rankin or Mr. Dubé.

4:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

Yes, I'll move that, Chair.

We obviously heard a lot about the horizontal integration and the learning curve that comes with such a committee. This amendment seeks to have the existing bodies provide different reports to the committee of parliamentarians. Specifically, we're talking about special reports from the RCMP's Civilian Review and Complaints Commission; reports from the CSE commissioner to the Attorney General on activities that may not be in compliance with the law; and the contents of the special briefings prepared by SIRC, and the special reports prepared by SIRC, two different things worth distinguishing. This was endorsed by Craig Forcese, Kent Roach, Ron Atkey, and Richard Fadden as well, so I hope I will have the support of the committee for this amendment.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Is there any discussion regarding the NDP amendment to clause 22?

Mr. Clement.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

The Conservative Party supports this amendment.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Are there any other comments?

Mr. Damoff.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

I just want to say it appears to me that the wording in clause 22 now allows those bodies to share information with the committee.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Okay.

Mr. Dubé.

4:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

It says the review bodies may provide to the committee, and then under “Exceptions”, what it must not, whereas our amendment says that in addition to the information the review body may provide—sorry, am I reading the right thing here? The “appropriate review body must provide to the Committee the following” and it makes those mandatory, as opposed to the more open language that is there. These reports aren't enumerated with a “must” before them in the legislation as drafted.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Continuing on clause 22, we'll move to NDP-11,

4:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

I'll move it anyway, I suppose, but it was more as a follow-up housekeeping amendment had we adopted our previous amendment, which would have just made cabinet confidences the only item that cannot be shared between the committee and the review bodies. It's a bit irrelevant now, because it was a complementary piece to the previous amendment.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

You'll hold on to it?

4:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC

Why not.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

Ms. Watts.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dianne Lynn Watts Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

I'm sorry, I need it again. I'm sorry to my colleague for jumping in.

The passing of the previous clause in the amendment, any agency that we have under review, and correct me if I'm wrong, doesn't have to give us information, if they choose not to.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant

I would ask the officials if they would like to comment on that.