My last question has to do with your public education allocation, the $2.5 million.
If that's to educate young people, as you stated previously, why is it that in Bill C-45 we're allowing children aged 12 to 18 to actually possess? If we didn't allow them to possess in that piece of legislation, wouldn't your public education issue with respect to driving and the use of this drug be irrelevant?
Also, in Bill C-46, which contains provisions about random testing for alcohol, why are other drugs not included in that bill?