Evidence of meeting #15 for Status of Women in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was disorders.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Patricia Lemoine  As an Individual
Valerie Steeves  Associate Professor, University of Ottawa
Laura Beattie  Co-chair, Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders Canada Task Force
Elaine Stevenson  Co-Administrator, Alyssa Stevenson Eating Disorder Memorial Trust

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Welcome to the 15th meeting of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women.

I would like to let committee members know that the Minister for the Status of Women will not be able to appear before the committee on Wednesday, March 5 to discuss the supplementary estimates (C).

Also, the main estimates for 2014-2015 were tabled and referred to the committee on February 27th last. You received an email about that today. If committee members agree, I will ask the clerk to invite the Minister for the Status of Women to appear before the committee for at most one hour between now and May 31 2014 to talk about the main estimates for 2014-2015. After she appears her officials will stay for the second hour, and we hope to have the meeting televised. So that is what we intend to do as far as the main estimates are concerned.

Ms. Truppe, you have the floor.

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

Where did we get May 31? I don't know if I missed something. I like having a date in there though.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Yes.

With the agreement of the committee, we will see about her availability. We certainly wouldn't want it to be May 29, let's say. We'll try to make it so she can come either when we come back in March or at the beginning of April.

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

Okay, so do we want to say then April 30? We can always change it again later if we have to, I suppose.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

It's just to check with the minister on her availability.

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

I know it's about her availability, but I'm just thinking that a lot of times with this minister, because she's travelling so much, the date may look okay and then she may have to change it. I'm just saying what if we said April 30, and we can always deal with that at that time and then do May 31 if we have to.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Madame Truppe, I'm not saying to meet her on May 31, but just to give her up to April—

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

Let's say April 30, the last day of the month. That gives March and April, two months.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Ms. Ashton, you have the floor.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

Niki Ashton NDP Churchill, MB

I want to make sure we don't have the minister here before the plans and priorities are tabled in the House, so that we have the information we need to get the right questions.

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

We should maybe coordinate that with the clerk or something.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

That's fine.

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

So it's based on her availability by April 30, and then we'll coordinate that with what Niki Ashton said.

3:30 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

That's for the plans and priorities. Okay.

So it seems we all agree.

I would like to welcome our witnesses. It is our pleasure to welcome Ms. Patricia Lemoine, who is appearing as an individual, and Ms. Valerie Steeves, associate professor at the University of Ottawa. We are also going to speak via videoconference to Ms. Laura Beattie, vice-president of the Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders Canada Task Force.

Also, by video conference from Winnipeg, Manitoba, we have Ms. Elaine Stevenson, who is an administrator for Alyssa Stevenson Eating Disorder Memorial Trust.

Welcome to you all. You will each have 10 minutes for your presentation, starting with Madam Lemoine.

3:30 p.m.

Patricia Lemoine As an Individual

Good afternoon.

First off, I would like to thank you for having invited me to appear before you today in view of this important study. I also want to emphasize how grateful I am that my employer has not only given me permission to attend this panel in person but also strongly encouraged me to do so. This is the perfect example of how it is important and necessary to have support in the workplace to maintain recovery from an eating disorder. As well, it exemplifies that it is possible, as a woman, to have a great career while being an activist in the field of mental health.

It was an illness born in the corners of my mind. It paralyzed me. It affected every aspect of my life and no, it was no bid for attention. For years, I suffered from a mental illness. It was invisible to the naked eye, but believe me, in my mind, it was very, very real. When I say that my eating disorder was invisible, I mean that since I suffered from bulimia and not anorexia—the most common eating disorder that comes to mind when on that topic—I was able to hide my illness very well since I maintained a normal weight. Yes, my BMI fluctuated greatly and at times was over 25, but mostly I looked normal.

I suffered from bulimia as a teen up until around the age of 25, which means it went undiagnosed and untreated for almost a decade. My condition got out of control in 2006, which I will talk about in a few minutes.

Today, I now consider myself recovered from bulimia, though I sometimes still suffer from anxiety—mostly related to food—especially during stressful times. I strongly believe that eating disorder recovery is possible, but I will add to that, that recovery maintenance is an everyday choice.

As a teen the voice in my head told me that I was lazy and fat, that I was not pretty enough, not good enough, not smart enough. Behind closed doors the bingeing and purging began. Later on, as a young adult, the demands of law school made me feel out of control, so I tried to regain power over my life by controlling food intake.

In the fall of 2006, after years of self-harm, and considering I'd had an especially stressful year living on my own, I hit rock bottom. I had lost 40 pounds within eight months and ended up suffering multiple gallbladder attacks. I eventually found myself in the ER in need of surgery to remove my gallbladder. That's when I knew the self-harm had to stop because I had a feeling my habits had something to do with the attacks I suffered from.

My gastroenterologist didn't ask about my eating patterns, didn't ask specific questions, but said that going for many hours without food, for example, and then eating a lot might be a contributing factor to my conditions. I didn't really comment on it. Also, as previously mentioned, I looked normal. I weighed 140 pounds which was considered, again, a normal weight for my height. The people around me though, my family and my friends, had started to comment on the fact that perhaps I was a bit too thin, that I had lost a lot of weight rather quickly, and that I didn't seem very healthy. But then again, many others congratulated me on my recent weight loss. I remember being mainly disappointed that either way I seemed to be failing one side no matter what I looked like.

I also distinctly remember a moment while I was being brought to the OR for laparoscopic gallbladder removal. I had an internal dialogue with myself and what my inner voice told me. I knew that I was at a crossroad. These few minutes for me were life-changing. I knew I was bulimic—probably, I suspect, the way that an addict knows they have a problem—even though I'd never said out loud I had those issues for fear of being labelled.

What I also knew is that I couldn't continue to live like this, if only for the fact that I might not live at all because, as you might know, bulimics can develop life-threatening complications. Quietly, a few minutes before the surgery, I naively almost prayed that the bully in my mind would also be somehow surgically removed during the process. Of course I knew this wasn't going to happen, but I really wished it could have because I didn't know how I would recover, yet I knew that I had to. To say that I felt helpless to my bulimia is an understatement.

In the following months, I sought help, and in therapy I was glad to speak to a professional who understood me and genuinely seemed to care about my well-being.

After a few sessions, though, I realized I unfortunately didn't meet the requirements for covered sessions in the public system since I'd also run out of sessions covered by my insurance. At $125 an hour in private care, the lack of affordable therapy was now an obstacle. There seemed to be no free help available even though I was willing to get help and admit that I had a problem.

Without therapy, a supportive social network was invaluable, but the stigma and the difficulty of talking about my illness got in the way at the start of what I considered to be my recovery. Although I had been in therapy for only a brief time, it had been very productive because I had learned the basics of how to cope with triggers, and I was able to create plans of action when I found myself triggered. Nonetheless, 2006 to 2008 was a very difficult time and I experienced many episodes of self-harm during that time.

What I decided to focus on in those first few weeks and months of recovery was the reasons I had to get better. I trusted that these reasons would guide me and carry me through onto the right path, and I pictured them as a road map to recovery.

It was simple things at first. I wanted recovery because I knew I'd need to be strong enough to finish my law degree and pack up my apartment after graduation. I knew I needed to recover to be a bridesmaid at my friend's wedding and not disappear during the reception in order to purge throughout the event. I knew I needed to recover because I knew I wanted to be free.

In the end it was a strong will to get better, combined with a lot of support and many expensive therapy sessions, which I was eventually able to afford as my career progressed. I didn't always have private insurance.

All of that allows me today, in 2014, to reach the milestone of six years without having given in to my eating disorder and engaged in self-harm.

My diagnosis with a mental illness did not define me. Eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric diagnosis. I am alive in front of you today. I am 32 years old and I am recovered.

When I graduated from law school in 2008 I decided not to write the Quebec bar exam, not to become an attorney, but rather I wanted to become recovered. I didn't see myself pursuing a legal career while recovering. I felt that recovering might be a lifelong process and these two realities seemed incompatible to me.

As many leaders have now said in public in the last few years, I believe there is no health without mental health, and that breaking the silence and opening a dialogue is critical when living with a mental illness—more specifically, an eating disorder in my case.

As part of my ongoing healing and recovery process, I became more active over time in promoting mental health initiatives and eating disorder awareness locally, nationally, and beyond. My goal as an activist with lived experience as an eating disorder survivor is to encourage dialogue to end stigma surrounding mental illness.

As one of my favourite authors Kurt Vonnegut famously once wrote, “You were sick, but now you're well, and there's work to do.”

Thank you.

3:40 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Thank you very much.

I will now give Ms. Steeves the floor for 10 minutes.

3:40 p.m.

Dr. Valerie Steeves Associate Professor, University of Ottawa

Thank you very much.

First I'd like to start by commending the committee for undertaking this study, I think it's incredibly important. I'd also like to commend Ms. Lemoine for her really important testimony before this committee and I really appreciate that you came and shared that with us.

Rather than looking at the individual level effects and consequences for people, I came to this issue from a different angle. I'd like to take some time and look at some of the structural issues that exist in the environment that position girls to be particularly vulnerable to eating disorders and problems with body image. I'm drawing on the findings from a research project that I co-lead with my colleague, professor Jane Bailey at the University of Ottawa, called the eGirls Project. We started the eGirls Project because we wanted to get a sense of how girls perform gender in online spaces.

When we went into this project we expected to find a diversity of different kinds of girl, where online media—because it does remove us one step from the physical world—would create opportunities for greater equality and greater freedom to express girls' authentic sense of self. Our very first foray into this field was stunning. We looked at over 1,500 social media profiles of girls who reported to be between the ages of 15 years old and 22 years old in Ottawa. And we found one monolithic performance of girl. It was a girl who was very ultra thin, very heteronormative, very white, very sexualized, that kind of thing. And we were fascinated by this because we thought that this was perhaps a reflection of the fact that we were looking at publicly available profiles.

So we got funding to sit down and talk with young women from Ontario, from both urban and rural areas, about their experiences online and what they thought of this particular performance of girl. And what we were told is that it is a normal girl online, that they are under an incredible amount of pressure to conform to this hyper thin ideal of feminine beauty that's so unattainable. And as we've thought through the reasons for this, we've come to the conclusion that there's an unintentional consequence that's built right into this combination of online architecture and the commercial agenda behind the sites that girls live on in online spaces. These sites are built around the seamless collection of personal information from the children who inhabit these sites. But it's not just their name and their address, that type of thing. Everything they do, everything they say, everything about their relationships with each other is collected. And all of that information is fed into an algorithm that sorts them for commercial purposes so they can be targeted, not just with ads, but targeted with a new environment to encourage certain kinds of behaviour. And there is research out there—and ours supports this conclusion as well—that suggests that the algorithm is not neutral. That when we are sorting these people, we're sorting them along the same “-isms”, the same discriminatory patterns that you see in offline spaces.

I want to give you two quick examples of how this works for the girls we talked to—both were my experiences online actually. Many years ago when I was on a very common early social networking site, I had been on the site reading all of their legal policies. I'd been there for about two weeks, I lived on this site. They knew my IP address as well as I knew their legal terms of use. And then I wanted to register on this site to see what it would be like to be a 16-year-old girl who lives in Vancouver. And I had been on this site and every time I went to the homepage I was surrounded with world news. It was a particular kind of world news, yes, but world news. You know, politics, the issues of the day. I registered as a 16-year-old girl and instantly that news disappeared and I was surrounded with celebrity news, talk of celebrity relationships, and celebrity tips on how to get skinny, ads for surgery so I could become more beautiful. So the algorithm sort just doesn't target young women with advertising, it chains the social environment that they live in to promote certain kinds of being girl.

Another interesting example from my own experience is this. At the same time, I was also on a lot of the anorexia sites online. I had been talking to a number of people about educational initiatives helping girls deal with these kinds of messages and recover from anorexia and bulimia. And one of the best educational sites was supported by ads powered by Google.

When you went to this educational site to learn about your illness and to be given information to help you deal with your illness, it was powered—I kid you not—by ads for plastic surgery and dieting aids. That's the first point.

This environment is changed to privilege and promote a certain kind of femininity that is highly dangerous for young women because it promotes a completely unrealistic expectation around body size and body image. This also has serious consequences for young women, and we have spent the last two or three years talking to a number of them. What we were told over and over again is that this is a highly stressful environment. They're under an incredible amount of pressure to conform. They have to be really skinny. They have to be made up with make up. They have to be sexy—not too sexy, but certainly sexy. All of the girls either said, “Yes, I do the duck face”, which is the sideways shot when you suck in your cheeks and you look like Angelina Jolie, or they laughed about doing it when they were younger. They were very self-reflexive about the fact that this wasn't necessarily very healthy or very pro-social, but at the same time they said, “Hey, it's a good way to look skinny online”. These young women were under incredible pressure to conform to unrealistic images of body size.

There are three stories I want to leave you with.

Here is the first one. Lingerie shots were big with 15-year-olds in the past year. Young girls would put on lingerie; they'd diet like crazy beforehand so they'd be good and skinny; and they'd post these on the Internet. I'd say, “Hey, what's up with that?”, and they'd say, “Well, those girls are confident”. I said, “Okay, what does that mean? What does confidence mean?” They said, “Well, you're confident enough to take off your clothes and pose on the Internet in a lingerie shot. As soon as you post it, you watch that picture like a hawk, and if you don't get 30 “likes” within the first 10 minutes—you know how when you're on Facebook and other social media, you press the “like” button—then you take it off, and it's a disaster, and you're humiliated.” So confidence was displaying a thin, highly sexualized body in online spaces and being “liked” by others. They didn't even see that it was a failure of confidence, because if you're not “liked” by others, you're shamed for it, so you have to get the picture down right away.

When we talked to all these young women, as I said, they told us stories about the stressfulness of this environment, and how difficult it is to be a young girl in today's environment when all these messages around them are telling them to be ultra-thin and to act in particular ways and to perform a very narrow kind of femininity. I do want to stress that this intersects not just with misogyny but also with racism and homophobia and other concerns for equality-seeking groups. When we said, “Where do you think this is coming from?”, many of them would say, “Well, hey, it's media. It's all around us. We are surrounded by it.”

In the second story I wanted to tell you, I was talking to a 15-year-old girl in an urban area in Ontario. We were having this conversation and we were talking about these issues, and I asked her what she does on Facebook. She said, “Girls are under so much pressure on media”. I said, “Okay, so you post pictures on Facebook?”, and she said, “No, I never put pictures of myself on Facebook”. I thought, “I found one. I found a girl who doesn't buy into it. She rejects the whole thing and says, 'I'm not going to do that because it's stupid'”, so I said, “Hey, why don't you put pictures of yourself on Facebook?” She said, “Because I'm fat and I'm ugly and I know it, and I'm not going to let any of those terrible people, those—expletive deleted—kids that I go to school with, tell me I'm fat and ugly. So I say I'm ugly and I don't put my picture up.”

First of all, she is underweight if anything. She's 15. In all the interviews I did, with one exception.... I, at one point, had to reach over to a girl who was crying and say, “But you are beautiful”. She was a beautiful girl, and she was trying so hard to conform to this, and it created so much tension, that instead she just rejected herself completely.

The last story I wanted to tell you—and I'll make it very short because my 10 minutes is just about up—I was talking to a 22-year-old woman, and again I thought this was great, because she was talking about how she uses media to promote a company she had started. She does a lot of crafts so she takes pictures of her crafts and sticks them up on Pinterest. Again I thought, “This is terrific. I've found a kid who has navigated this well”, but she said, “Oh, no, it wasn't always like that. I actually had a lot of trouble with body image”. She began cutting when she was in high school, so I asked her what happened.

She said, “Well, I hit grade 9 and I was desperate to be popular. I did everything: I dieted, I did the makeup, I did the clothes. I did everything I could to fit in with the cool group. One day when I was at school I checked in on Facebook. I was friends with one of the popular girls at school, and she had posted a picture of her and me on her Facebook page.”

Another girl within their group of friends had posted, “We all know why you posted that picture”. She looked at it, and she didn't know, so she went up to the girl who was in the picture with her and asked what this was about. The girl said, “Surely you know”. She responded with, “No, I don't know. What is she talking about and what is everybody on Facebook now seeing about me?” The girl said, “Well, you're fat and you're ugly. You make me look good. That's why I'm friends with you. That's why I put pictures of you up on my Facebook page."

So not only are we making it incredibly difficult for young women to navigate through the social space, we are allowing the commercial mining of the social world that these young women live in. We're also making it really difficult for them to have healthy relationships with each other, where they can support each other as they try to push back against this.

I'll end my comments with that. Thank you very much.

3:50 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Thank you very much for a fascinating presentation.

Now, Ms. Beattie, for 10 minutes, please. Thank you.

3:50 p.m.

Laura Beattie Co-chair, Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders Canada Task Force

Good afternoon. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak today.

First, I want to acknowledge that families with sons get eating disorders as well. We must not forget our sons. I feel if we make this just about girls and women, we are only perpetuating the stigma and myths attached to this illness.

I can give you my family's story to give you an idea of what happens with successful interventions for anorexia, but I urge you to hear from other families who have children who have had to transition into the adult system, who have sons, who have children younger than 10 when diagnosed, who have been on wait-lists and have been in-patients, and who have children with binge-eating disorder or bulimia.

My daughter is 17 years old this month. She has been in recovery for almost four years. She is a happy, healthy, beautiful teenager, full of life and spark. Her father and I keep an eye out for signs and symptoms that we have educated ourselves to be aware of. We store in the back of our minds that recovery is precious and that relapses can occur. So we watch, ready to step in if necessary and put recovery back on track. We know there are parents of young adults who have successfully helped their children to maintain recovery, and that there are steps we can take to help support our daughter once she is of legal age.

My daughter was 13 when diagnosed with restrictive anorexia nervosa. She was 12 when she fell off her growth trajectory. During her well-child visit her height and weight were plugged into a formula and the result was considered a normal BMI for her age. Research shows that eating disorder signs and symptoms first begin to appear at least two years before diagnosis, when height and weight are plotted on a growth chart. There was also discussion around age-relevant stages of development, but nothing about signs and symptoms of eating disorders.

She never had body image issues. There was no talk of diets or dieting in our house.

We had a series of medical misadventures in our search to find out what to do to help our daughter. I was asked to call the eating disorders clinic intake. A parent would never have to make a self-referral to an oncology clinic if cancer were a suspected diagnosis. We were triaged by an intake worker who asked me questions through the lens of adult eating disorders. Children and adolescents are not small adults.

We were referred back to our family health team to meet with a mental health counsellor. In the meantime, I watched my daughter's health deteriorate...anxious, cold, weak, socially withdrawn, running back and forth through the woods, skating laps for hours on the pond, running up and down the stairs, unable to sit for any length of time, and eating very little. Internally, her brain was shrinking, puberty stalled, growth stopped, her bones were thinning, and her heart rate slowed.

I found the online organization F.E.A.S.T., Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders, and its online parent forum, Around the Dinner Table, and discovered that there was evidence-based treatment for adolescents. Most importantly, I learned that our family could help my daughter recover from her eating disorder, and that there was an evidence-based treatment called family-based treatment, or FBT, that was the best shot at recovery for adolescents.

Unsure of where this treatment was available, my husband and I began to re-feed our daughter using the Maudsley method, and I read everything I could get my hands on. I felt supported and encouraged by other parents who were also experiencing the isolation, the blaming, and the lack of adequate and timely treatment and support for families.

I'd like to walk you through re-feeding, what it looks like, and what it takes to work. We did this for five months until my daughter was weight-restored, which is a moving target in someone so young, due to puberty and adolescent growth. Our family focused our life around getting our daughter nutritionally weight-restored. It's a 24/7 job. I resigned from my job, and we made our house into an in-patient unit. My goal was to feed my daughter one bite at a time.

First, I'd like you to imagine your worst fear. You can probably avoid this fear and the anxiety that it creates. We were exposing our daughter to her worst fear, but she could not avoid food or she would die. Our daughter would cry, scream, spit, hit, punch, scratch, and yell that it was too much food, that her stomach hurt, that she wanted to die. Plates of food were thrown. My daughter would fall into a catatonic state. It was like a scene from The Exorcist.

Meals could take hours, but food is medicine. We learned to separate the eating disorder from our daughter. Intuitively, you do not want to see your child upset and in pain, but when we're re-feeding, there is no choice. There is no rationalizing with an eating disorder.

This was not forced feeding, and it was not punitive. It was a requirement, using whatever leverage we had. Life stops until you eat. There is no option: food is your medicine. If meals are refused, then plan B is put in place: a trip to emergency for an NG tube feed, or a call to the mobile crisis unit.

I was lucky that I never had to do this. We weathered through the emotional dysregulation, anxiety, and lengthy meal times. From my reading I understood what was happening in the brain. This made it easier for me to exhibit patience. My daughter was exhibiting a typical fight-or-flight response to an anxious situation. From a neurobiological standpoint it made sense.

My son, who is two years older than his sister, would try to offer her distractions of stories and singing at meals. Many times dinner would run until 11 p.m. He would study and sleep with earplugs in. After meals we would sit with her to prevent her from compulsively exercising and standing and distracting her from the physical discomfort she felt. We needed to close the loopholes around the illness. I slept in my daughter's room for five months because she was frightened and I had to monitor for any nighttime compulsive exercising. I monitored her computer use to make sure she was not accessing pro-ana sites and that she was not discussing suicide. We listened outside the bathroom to make sure she didn't purge or exercise. We barricaded our loft so that it wasn't a safety risk, we hid the knives and medications. We turned the TV off to avoid content that could be triggering and upsetting to all of us. When she would run out into the snow in her bare feet to avoid a meal my husband, son, and I would have to chase her, bringing her back kicking and screaming. In early days, I shadowed her 24/7 and she hated it.

Due to exercise restriction I drove my daughter to and from school, and then I drove back to the school twice a day to sit with her during two nutrition breaks. She was not allowed to be in gym class or participate in any of the extracurricular sports that she loved. I looked through the course curriculum for her grade to make sure there was no information within the curriculum that could be triggering, and that she could not participate in. Ironically, she had just finished the unit on eating disorders.

A few weeks into re-feeding, our GP referred us to a pediatrician and adolescent psychiatrist. Neither knew much about the Maudsley method of re-feeding or family-based treatment and how it worked. Our pediatrician told me it was too hard, that I should return to work and give my daughter age-appropriate independence around food preparation and eating. This was fundamentally inaccurate and dangerous advice.

The pediatrician referred us to a child psychologist to make our daughter feel better about herself. The psychologist said that she would always have anorexia, but was unaware of family-based treatment and that eating disorders are fully treatable. What a waste of time and money, and how crushing for my 13-year-old daughter to hear.

We finally entered the FBT adolescent eating disorders program in my hometown three weeks after re-feeding began. We had already begun to see results. Our daughter was smiling and less withdrawn at school. She began to sing again. Over the next five months, with support from FBT, and then participating in a year-long, multi-family treatment program, we managed to get my daughter's weight restored and into recovery.

With food and time, the exercise compulsion stopped. The OCD-like movements decreased. She socialized and she began to enjoy food again. I almost cried when she told me how good a meal tasted. Family mealtimes were no longer violent or unenjoyable.

But this is not a sprint; it's a marathon of vigilance. It takes days and months and years of chasing growth through puberty and adolescence. It's about the dance of figuring out when and how much control over food choices to slowly give back to your child. It's about not letting your child sleep in like other teens because they must eat regularly. It's about figuring out what courses your child cannot take in school, such as personal fitness, nutrition, or physical education, if they are still at a vulnerable stage in their recovery.

It's about educating teachers to make sure your child is allowed to eat in class to maintain regular nutrition. It's about figuring out whether your child is at a stage in recovery where he or she can participate in class trips and summer camp, and educating these institutions to see if modifications can be put in place to support recovery and give your child a sense of normalcy and accomplishment at the same time.

Imagine trying to do all this as a single, self-employed parent; if your other children are very young or have their own special needs; if you have to provide eldercare as well; or if you have your own health concerns. What if your child is physically larger than you?

Comorbid conditions like ADHD, OCD, depression, or substance abuse must be addressed as well.

Imagine reading about FBT in Saskatchewan or P.E.I. or Quebec, and realizing that you have no way of accessing this therapy that has the best treatment outcomes. What if your child has had to be hospitalized, and then after discharge you are placed on a wait-list for a program and you helplessly watch your child begin to slip back into the illness because you need support? Or what if you have a child who is over 18 and your family wants to use FBT, but the centre where you live will only see your child individually as an adult? What about those families for whom FBT doesn't work?

l suffered from depression and post-traumatic stress after re-feeding our daughter. Our now 19-year-old son became depressed due to the stress and trauma of his family putting all their energy and attention into dealing with the eating disorder. My daughter felt shame and guilt for putting her family through this ordeal despite our reassurances that nobody was to blame. She will sometimes have flashbacks of the trauma of re-feeding. They are not accurate, but they are there.

This has not been an easy road and we are not finished. We need to make sure that when our daughter leaves home she has a tool kit for recovery and resilience. When your child becomes ill with an eating disorder at a young age and you have been the safety net to prevent relapse, it is very easy to be lulled into thinking that a child has recovered and there won't be a relapse. We must be cautiously vigilant yet allow our children to live in the real, unfiltered world.

Thank you.

4:05 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Thank you very much.

I will now give the floor to Ms. Stevenson for 10 minutes.

4:05 p.m.

Elaine Stevenson Co-Administrator, Alyssa Stevenson Eating Disorder Memorial Trust

Madam Chair and committee members, thank you for the opportunity to present to you on eating disorders. I feel fortunate to have worked in partnership with many of the people who have previously presented to this committee on Canadian eating disorder services advocacy.

I would like to share with you my personal observations on the harmful effects that eating disorders can have on your child, your entire family, and society in general.

I will provide a list of recommendations concerning a number of urgently needed eating disorder services. This list has been formed over the 24 years that I have been involved as an advocate for those suffering from eating disorders. I have had the privilege of meeting many family members and their children suffering from eating disorders from across Canada. I have met many of them at conferences where I have spoken, provincially, nationally, and internationally, and at community forums for clinicians, and I have often lectured to fourth-year mental health nurses.

Eating disorders are cloaked in the three S's: shame, secrecy, and silence. This condition is made worse by its debilitating, deteriorating, and potentially deadly effect on those who suffer. Eating disorders affect those from many cultures and socio-economic backgrounds. I am alarmed, but sadly not surprised, by the intensive research results here in Canada by Dr. Leora Pinhas that indicate that children as young as five years of age are developing eating disorders.

Anorexia has the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric illness. It is estimated that 10% of the individuals with anorexia will die within 10 years of the onset of the eating disorder.

On August 27—I have a picture of our daughter Alyssa—our family's lives changed forever. Our daughter Alyssa passed away at 24 years of age after a 12-year battle with her eating disorder. Alyssa's eating disorder and her death continue today to have serious consequences for our family. Countless other families all across Canada also continue to feel the effects of losing a family member to an eating disorder.

I am very saddened that today, after 24 years as an advocate, we still have many families desperately searching for timely, specialized eating disorder programming for their children. Long waiting lists exist from as much as six months to a year and a half for many who suffer. As you have already heard from Dr. Woodside, early specialized eating disorder treatment intervention, as with many other illnesses, is often one of the most important keys to a successful recovery.

The situation is often worse for many who live in rural and northern communities. Mental health workers in these areas service several communities spread out over a wide area and often do not have expertise in treating eating disorders. Critical eating disorder services are often only offered in large urban cities. It is extremely difficult for many to leave their homes and family for intensive eating disorder treatment in a city where they know nobody and often feel isolated and depressed. Parents often can't leave their jobs to provide emotional support during their child's treatment. Some clients leave treatment early due to loneliness and isolation from their families.

Many times families know instinctively that their child is in extreme physical, mental, and emotional danger. Their child can't wait for treatment, and they will search frantically for specialized private eating disorder therapists or programs, or will send their child out of province and even out of country for treatment. Many parents also have to pick up living expenses for their children, as many who suffer from eating disorders are unable to work.

As parents, we had no choice but to seek private therapy for Alyssa. At $120 an hour—now this is back in the 1990s; it's up to about $150 or $160 now—three times a week for three-hour sessions for almost 12 years, therapy financially impacted our whole family.

I am outraged that the issue of long waiting lists for urgently needed eating disorder treatment still occurs across our country. To me, there is something inherently wrong with a public health care system that often only becomes available when someone is on death's door.

We would never think of making patients suffering from cancer, diabetes, or heart disease wait that long for urgent treatment. Yet, eating disorders can be just as deadly, as many suffer continually from electrolyte imbalances that can lead to cardiac arrest, kidney failure, and even death. We're talking about saving people's lives here, improving their quality of life, and helping them to begin treatment to feel well again.

Under Canada's Health Act, two of the five principles, universality and accessibility, indicate that all insured residents are entitled to the same level of health care and all insured persons have reasonable access to health care facilities. These principles do not exist for many suffering from eating disorders all across Canada.

In addition, many eating disorder clients also have co-occurring illnesses, such as obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, severe depression, early onset of osteoporosis, severe dental problems, and drug addiction. They often engage in self-harm, such as burning, cutting, and even attempting or succeeding at suicide.

In the case of drug addiction, sometimes as parents we feel caught in the middle as many service providers will not take your child into treatment until the drug addiction or eating disorder is cured first. Both are dangerous health issues and I feel strongly that more programs need to be created that can treat concurrent illnesses at the same time.

As a society we also need to take a critical look at negative media messaging, often fuelled by the very powerful multi-billion dollar diet industry that consistently bombards us with the promise that being thin will bring you great health, happiness, sexiness, and acceptance by society. The pursuit of perfection and unachievable societal standards of beauty are causing irreparable physical, mental, emotional, spiritual damage, and even death.

As a parent and advocate I am often troubled by the fact that many doctors do not know or do not have much training in the treatment of eating disorders. I ask myself, “Why are many doctors often assessing only a person's body mass index to determine their overall health and whether there is a presence of an eating disorder?” Especially when the World Health Organization, in 1946, defined health as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

Consistent with this definition, interventions aimed at addressing any health concerns should be constructed from a holistic perspective, where equal consideration is given to social, mental, emotional, and physical aspects of health. To me one of the most serious omissions is that, provincially and federally, governments across our country are not tracking the incidence with which this deadly illness occurs. Experts that have already testified before you estimate that over a half a million Canadians suffer from eating disorders.

I believe that death statistics from eating disorders are not properly recorded. Often, the cause of death is listed as cardiac or kidney failure, and the contributing cause of death is listed as bulimia, anorexia, or often it's not even filled out. I know without a doubt that Alyssa's 12-year battle with an eating disorder was the cause of her death and the contributing cause to her death was cardiac pulmonary embolism, brought on directly by her eating disorder.

Dr. Blake Woodside testified that:

About 60% of my patients have chronic complex post-traumatic stress disorder. They've been sexually or physically abused. They will work for eight or ten years to recover from that...

Our daughter was sexually abused on several occasions and it wasn't until after her death that we as parents were able to find out the specific details of what had happened to her as she had declared the sexual abuse as an adult to her doctor and therapist. I feel strongly that, had we known the specific details, we may have had an opportunity to have brought closure to Alyssa on what happened and had an opportunity to support her in any criminal charges should she wished to have laid them, and maybe, yes maybe, even had a chance to save her life.

I believed with everything in my heart that we could have saved Alyssa from what she referred to as the monster within. But we were wrong. We can't bring Alyssa and all the others back who have died from eating disorders in Canada and indeed around the world.

The establishment of your status of women committee on eating disorders has given me so much hope that we can work together in partnership to save lives from this horrible and lethal illness. While there has been progress in eating disorder treatment over my 24 years as an advocate, it has been at a very slow and painful pace for those who suffer and their families.

Now I know I don’t have time to read all my recommendations—and I hope those have been forwarded to the committee already—but there’s one I must read: emergency and ICU training. We must ensure intensive training is required for clinicians who treat gravely ill eating disorder clients. They must have ongoing training to keep up to date on best practices and changes in treatment delivery. I believe, from our daughter's experience, that it is critical that all ICU staff be educated about re-nourishment and re-feeding syndrome and the essential need to re-nourish clients very, very slowly and monitor very closely to avoid electrolyte imbalances, seizures, cardiac arrhythmia, and even death.

In addition, we must look at different therapies to provide treatment for those who have suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and abuse—verbal, physical, emotional, and sexual.

4:15 p.m.

NDP

The Chair NDP Hélène LeBlanc

Thank you very much, Mrs. Stevenson. Indeed, we thank you very much for writing the recommendations that you have passed on. We'll have them translated and distributed to all the committee members.

Thank you very much for the four very, very good testimonies.

We will start with the questions.

Mrs. Truppe, for seven minutes.

4:15 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I'd like to welcome and thank each of you for your very personal testimony. I know it was probably hard for many of you who experienced it personally, so I just want to take a moment to thank you. I'm sure all of us here really appreciate that and know the difficulty that you had.

I'll start with Madame Lemoine.

Thank you, certainly, for your story. It's nice when we can talk to someone who has experienced it and can give us ideas that may help at the end of this study.

Just so I'm understanding, I think you said you had it from being a teen to 25, and then you lost 40 pounds and you had to go in for surgery for your gallbladder.

4:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Patricia Lemoine

Right, that's correct.

4:15 p.m.

Conservative

Susan Truppe Conservative London North Centre, ON

When did you know it was wrong? Did you know it was wrong during that teen to 25, that whole time? Did anyone diagnose that, or did you have to figure this out on your own?