I thought Monsieur Guimond made good points about the letter versus the spirit of the law, and doing things directly or indirectly. I think a number of people, including Mr. Jean, have commented that the act was badly drafted.
So I'm wondering what you would think of some potential amendment of the act to make more explicit what was previously implicit in it, an amendment to the effect that not just Air Canada but also derivatives of Air Canada, like Aveos, would be required to have their facilities in these three cities. That would put peace in people's minds so there's no uncertainty as to whether these jobs might be transferred out of the country.
What would you think of amending the act to tighten it up so that it reflected the intentions of people like Mr. Mazankowski at the time it was drafted?