Just to clarify, the emergency directive that was issued did require railways to carry out these risk assessments. It gave them a series of factors to consider taken from some of the U.S. activities and some of our own considerations. Those will be provided to us and we will look at them, but they are still being done. I'm not sure that we've received any as of yet.
In the meantime, in the emergency directive, there were specific instructions and directions to reduce speed and to carry out some of these other effects, to look at wayside detections and a whole series of other mitigation measures for reducing risk. Finally, the other element that was important in that emergency directive was the direction to the railways to develop a protocol with local municipalities which have local knowledge, local issues of concern, and to see how those risk factors and those inputs could be fed into the railway risk assessment.
This is something that was put in place very quickly and required them to comply immediately, but there are steps that will need to have further work. Certainly Transport Canada will be looking very closely at those risk assessments.