Evidence of meeting #20 for Veterans Affairs in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was training.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Marie-Josée Lemieux  Vice-President, Ordre des psychologues du Québec
Stéphane Beaulieu  Secretary General, Ordre des psychologues du Québec
Édith Lorquet  Legal Counsel and Secretary of the Discipline Committee , Ordre des psychologues du Québec

4:55 p.m.

Vice-President, Ordre des psychologues du Québec

Marie-Josée Lemieux

Therefore, if you want to attract students and get them interested in working with veterans, the department should offer paid internships at Sainte-Anne's Hospital, for instance, and there is no doubt that many new psychologists would want to specialize in that field. There's no doubt about it.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

As it turns out, that wraps up Mr. Stanton's time--but Mr. Sweet, you looked at me as though you wanted to potentially continue.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

No, I think I've exhausted the questions that I wanted to make sure were asked.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

Mr. Stanton, Mr. Merrifield, do you have any follow-up questions?

Okay. Then it's over to

Mr. Perron, of the Bloc Québécois, you have five minutes.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, QC

As far as the paid internships are concerned, I'll tell you what the problem is, it's not rocket science. Each province is responsible for its own health care system. So Quebec has chosen its own model. Is it the good one? I'm not criticizing it. However, that's why it is extremely difficult to compare one province with another in the areas of health or education. These are provincial jurisdictions. That's why it is extremely difficult to draw comparisons.

The program you were asking questions about is precisely the one we are studying here. The Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs is trying to find ways to provide better services to three types of veterans: elderly veterans, that is, those 80 years old and over, those who participated in peace missions, and the younger veterans, especially those suffering from post-traumatic stress. We have to find ways to provide them with better treatment.

I am convinced that it would be a good idea for the Ordre des psychologues du Québec to meet with senior officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs. You said that there are enough psychologists in Quebec. If you draw the ratio, there are seven million Quebeckers and 8,000 psychologists, which represents about 0.01% of the population of Quebec.

In Afghanistan, there are 2,500 members of the Canadian Forces and 4,000 or 5,000 civilians on the ground, but there is only one psychiatrist and one nurse who has a certain amount of training in psychology or psychiatry, and then there are the chaplains, who save souls. That's all we have to treat our soldiers.

A little earlier, you asked whether we could focus on prevention. Yes, we can. We spend millions of dollars to train our soldiers in the United States for five or six months before sending them out on a mission. They are taught about post-traumatic stress for a couple of hours, they are told about the symptoms and the conditions. I am referring to what Dr. Chantal Descôteaux said; she is the Chief Medical Officer at CFB Valcartier.

I've been an MP for 11 years and it's barely been two years that the Department of National Defence has been quietly talking about psychological or operational injuries. The talk used to be all about nervous breakdown, semi-nervous breakdown, very nervous, not too nervous, all kinds of nervous breakdowns, but it only ever was nervous breakdowns. Sometimes, members committed suicide, which marks the unfortunate end of post-traumatic stress.

I've met with people my son's age who are suffering from post-traumatic stress. When I saw them, they were all “fucked up”—pardon my English—, they had “lost it”, they were on drugs, they were drunk, and they were divorced because their wives and children had left in fear, and it was really pathetic.

You have your work cut out for out. I am willing to help you make contacts. We could make the Department of Veterans Affairs more sensitive to the need to better train psychologists, to hire more of them, to have them work in isolated regions, not only in Quebec but in the rest of Canada as well. This is not an issue of politics or of country; this issue affects the health and future of our youth, these 25 or 30-year old kids who are all messed up.

That was my final, very emotional, comment. You can respond now. Thank you very much, that was terrific.

5 p.m.

Vice-President, Ordre des psychologues du Québec

Marie-Josée Lemieux

May I respond?

5 p.m.

Bloc

Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, QC

Yes, you can say whatever you want.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

Please try to respond in parliamentary language, regardless of what....

5 p.m.

Bloc

Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, QC

My language was not parliamentary.

5 p.m.

Vice-President, Ordre des psychologues du Québec

Marie-Josée Lemieux

We are all very sensitive to the issues you have raised. The reason we are members of the Ordre des psychologues is because we are sensitive to the suffering of others and we really want to help those people get better and to send them on the road to recovery.

We would be pleased to meet with officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs, if they want to meet with us. As we saw today, we don't have an answer for each and everyone of your questions, but if we can have officials meet with people in Quebec who could help them develop measures, we would be pleased to do so.

Thank you.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

Okay, now I believe I've extinguished the list of questioners.

Thank you very much for your presentations today. I hope you'll be okay.

Usually I carry on with some business. I would just like to raise some ideas with some of the committee members quickly before we wrap up.

We have, of course, the trips we're going to be taking to Petawawa and Quebec City. Just after those trips are dealt with, we still have the witnesses Mr. Stoffer of the New Democratic Party wanted us to have. On May 1 we will have Dr. MacKinnon, whom some of you had a chance to meet in Shearwater, and on May 13 we'll have General Semianiw and Surgeon General Jaeger. They've already been scheduled. I get a sense from several parties, though, that there is a willingness to move on to finalize our report and to then carry on from there and move to the next issue.

So I'm just putting it to the committee for their thoughts. I am open to the idea that these witnesses can present written submissions, since we've had a chance to hear them previously in some format, and to allow Michel, for example, to work them into the report we're going to be looking at, at least in draft form, next Thursday. So I'd like to get some feedback from the committee on that.

Go ahead, Mr. St. Denis.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Brent St. Denis Liberal Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, ON

As we're going to have another cut at the report next Thursday, and since we'll have our two other field trips completed by a week Tuesday, and as impressive as Dr. MacKinnon was and continues to be in Shearwater, if she were willing to make additional comments in writing....

Where are the other people from?

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

They are from the Department of National Defence.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Brent St. Denis Liberal Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, ON

Are they here in town?

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

I assume so. I don't know. We're not sure. They're all over the place. They're generals.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Brent St. Denis Liberal Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, ON

In any event, with the uncertainty of timing, I would suggest that it would be reasonable to ask them to put something in writing that would be helpful so we could try to wrap this up, conceivably at the end of April-ish.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

That sounds copacetic with me. Do we have feedback from other parties around the table?

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

David Sweet Conservative Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON

What I like about this committee, Mr. Chairman, is that the amount of agreement we have on so many things is just phenomenal. I think it's the case here, as well, on prolonging it another month. I think all of us are feeling that we need to get to this report and get through it line by line and get it done. So I fully agree with Mr. St. Denis.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

Fair enough.

Do we have any feedback from our friends in the Bloc? Monsieur Perron, there are three witnesses who have been booked: Dr. MacKinnon, whom some committee members had a chance to meet in Shearwater; and on May 13, General Semianiw and Surgeon General Jaeger.

I sense that there are several parties around the table, certainly the Conservative party and the Liberal party, that are of the mind that maybe we can take written submissions from these people. We'll have toured the bases by then. I think people want to get on with the report, finalize it, and move on to the next subject. So the idea is to consider taking written submissions from those people and to move on to the next subject.

5:05 p.m.

Bloc

Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, QC

Yes, okay, no problem.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Anders

Okay, so Mr. Perron and the Bloc are in agreement with that. That's just so we touch base with everybody on that. Fair enough. We'll probably inform Mr. Stoffer of that.

With that, I think I'm going to call the committee meeting adjourned.

Thank you very much to our witnesses for your appearance today and for your feedback. Thank you.

The meeting is adjourned.