Perhaps we could pick up on that a little bit, because one of the things we got from the charter states that we want to build on existing education skills, training, and experience, and to your point, you stated that it needs to go beyond that.
Probably the reason that was there is it would be potentially easier for a veteran. If they're transitioning into civilian life, they would want to be able to use their existing skills.
To your point, you mentioned that we also need to look at aptitude and interest. I would suggest that we're doing that. In one of your comments you actually made reference to a veteran, for example, who was a traffic technician in the Canadian Forces but who wants to become an electrician and has the aptitude to do so, and that person should be supported to become an electrician. I would agree with you. I would think that with the Veterans Charter that would be understood.
This $75,800 will pay for a four-year university education or college education. I would think that veterans would have a choice in the type of program when they work with their case worker. I would think that would be understood.
Are you suggesting to me that it isn't the case?