House of Commons Hansard #17 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was deficit.

Topics

Referendum ActRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Reform

Diane Ablonczy Reform Calgary Nose Hill, AB

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-250, an act to amend the Referendum Act.

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to reintroduce a private member's bill that I introduced in the last Parliament. It amends the Referendum Act of Canada. Its purpose is to allow the people of Canada to actually do what democracy allows them to do and that is to rule.

In my view more mechanisms are needed for the people of Canada to have a direct say in the decisions which are made that affect their future. This referendum bill sets out a mechanism that allows the people of the country to play a larger and more specific role in the legislative process.

I look forward to debate on this bill and perhaps to it being passed by the House.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Liberal

Albina Guarnieri Liberal Mississauga East, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-251, an act to amend the Criminal Code and the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (cumulative sentences).

Mr. Speaker, I stand yet again for the victims of multiple murderers and other serial predators to introduce for the third time a bill to end volume discounts for rapists and murderers.

Most acutely, over the past few months, Canadians have witnessed in justified disgust how Canada's courts automatically absolve murderers and rapists of all but their first offence through the very legal obscenity of concurrent sentencing.

I would like to thank the member for Lambton—Kent—Middlesex for seconding this bill and for joining the members of the House who place the rights of victims and the protection of law-abiding citizens ahead of the interests of our most vocal predator protection industry.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Reform

Deborah Grey Reform Edmonton North, AB

Mr. Speaker, in accordance with Standing Order 36, I would like to present a couple of petitions on behalf of the people in Medley and Edmonton, Alberta.

The petitioners state that there are profound inadequacies in the sentencing practices concerning individuals convicted of impaired driving charges. They think that Canada must embrace a philosophy of zero tolerance toward individuals who drive while impaired by alcohol or drugs.

Therefore, the petitioners pray and request that Parliament proceed immediately with amendments to the Criminal Code that will ensure that the sentence given to anyone convicted of driving while impaired or causing injury or death while impaired reflects both the severity of the crime and zero tolerance by Canada toward this crime. The sooner we act on that the better.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Reform

Deborah Grey Reform Edmonton North, AB

Mr. Speaker, I have another enormous petition which conforms to Standing Order 36. It is signed by literally thousands of residents in the Edmonton, Sherwood Park, northern Alberta area and by many other people across Canada who are talking about the dreadful murder of Susan Klassen of Yukon.

This petition comes from her sister, Brenda MacDonald, in my constituency and from deeply concerned citizens. They believe that the provocation defence as it is currently used in femicide and wife slaughter cases inappropriately and unjustly changes the focus of the criminal trial from the behaviour of the accused to the behaviour of the victim who, from then on, is identified as the one responsible for the accused violence. It is shameful and it is not right.

More specifically, it is not consistent with the constitutional rights of women, including their right to equal protection and benefit of the law and the right to life, liberty and security.

Thousands of people pray that the defence of provocation be dealt with in the Criminal Code just as soon as possible. I urge the justice minister to do that.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

NDP

John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, it is my pleasure to present a petition this morning from many constituents of Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre and other parts of Saskatchewan.

The petitioners are very concerned about the pricing of gasoline in this country. They feel that the price of gasoline is set by all companies in an unjustified manner. They believe that since energy is a key component and the most fundamental component of our economy, there should be some control of its pricing.

They call on Parliament to set up an energy price review commission to keep gasoline pricing and other energy products in check.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Reform

Diane Ablonczy Reform Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to present this petition which is a joint effort between Canadians from the province of Quebec and Canadians from across Alberta, my own province.

This group of people are very concerned about the unity of our country. They ask Parliament and the Prime Minister of Canada to confirm that Canada is indivisible and that the boundaries of Canada may be modified only by a pre-vote of all Canadian citizens or through an amending formula stipulated in the Canadian Constitution.

I hope the Prime Minister is watching and will pay attention to the prayer of these petitioners.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Reform

Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, these petitions were originally sent to Sharon Hayes, the former member from the riding of Port Moody—Coquitlam.

It is my honour and privilege to present them on her behalf. There are some 500 signatures from her riding, another thousand from the lower mainland and several hundred from the prairie provinces. It has to deal with the issue of age of consent.

These petitioners ask Parliament to consider changing the age of consent from 14 to 16, which could assist in the prosecution of adults who buy sex from young people because the adult could then be charged with sexual assault. It would not be necessary to prove some of the other things that are necessary under the current Criminal Code.

The efforts of these people to try to make the streets safer for young people and to try to make it difficult for predators to prey on young kids are a laudable effort. I support their goal.

It is interesting that many of the people who signed their names here are teenagers who feel that the current law needs to be changed.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Liberal

Peter Adams Liberal Peterborough, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have a petition from some hundreds of Canadians who pray that the prime minister and the Parliament of Canada declare and confirm immediately that Canada is indivisible and that the boundaries of Canada, its provinces, territories and territorial waters may be modified only by a free vote of all Canadian citizens or through the amending formula as stipulated in the Canadian Constitution.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Liberal

Peter Adams Liberal Peterborough, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have another petition from 200 residents of the region of Peterborough who draw the attention of the House to the fact that women in Ontario can now appear legally in public bare breasted.

Therefore these petitioners request that Parliament review and amend the charter of rights and freedoms and/or the Criminal Code of Canada to include this practice as being illegal, except in special circumstances such as breast feeding.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Peterborough Ontario

Liberal

Peter Adams LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I would ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is that agreed?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Independent

John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I ask that you seek unanimous consent to revert to the introduction of private bills.

I would like to apologize to the House. I was to introduce a bill today but I was delayed at the session on parliamentary reform in West Block.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Independent

John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-252, an act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial review).

Mr. Speaker, this is the third time I am introducing this bill in the House. This bill would repeal section 745 of the Criminal Code, and in the result all those convicted of murder would have to serve a minimum of 25 years in prison before having the opportunity to seek parole.

In the last House this bill passed at second reading and it went to committee. I would hope that in this Parliament, the 36th Parliament, we will have the opportunity to have this bill debated again and ultimately passed by this House because that is the will of the people of Canada.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Reform

Ted White Reform North Vancouver, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. In view of the fact that this House had previously passed this bill in the 35th Parliament, and also in light of what we managed to do here for the hon. member opposite who had the proceeds of crime bill where we passed it by unanimous consent, I might ask for unanimous consent of the House to deem the hon. member's bill to have passed all stages and be referred to the Senate.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

There is no consent.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:15 a.m.

Reform

Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I would like to make a motion similar to that or ask for consent of the House.

Rather than the previous motion which was to pass all stages and refer to the Senate, in light of what was approved in the last Parliament and with broad consent in Canadian society, I wonder if we could have the bill from the member from York South—Weston referred to committee for study immediately rather than go through the private member's process.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:20 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:20 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

10:20 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker

There is no consent.

SupplyGovernment Orders

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Alexa McDonough NDP Halifax, NS

moved:

That this House comdemns the Government's use of high unemployment to meet targets on the deficit and inflation, its refusal to set targets and timetables for reducing unemployment, its failure to make adequate investments in health care, education, training, culture and the environment, and its pursuit of a monetary policy obsessed with future inflation and blind to the immediate human tragedy of 1.4 million unemployed Canadians.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to have an opportunity to enter this debate on the first NDP opposition day not just of this parliamentary session but the first NDP opposition day in four years since the New Democratic Party was re-established as an official party in the Parliament of Canada.

The motion has been read into the record. A short version of the motion is simply that this house condemns the government for its failure to make jobs the number one priority, to make jobs the real priority of its economic policy.

The essence of the argument is quite simple. It is quite straightforward. It will not be the first time that members have heard me say this and it will not be the last time they will hear New Democrat members of this Parliament say it.

If the government can set and meet targets to reduce inflation, to reduce the deficit, then the government can set and meet targets to reduce unemployment. It is such a straightforward argument that it is of increasing concern and an increasing puzzle to Canadians why the federal government just does not get it.

For 84 consecutive months unemployment in Canada has been at or above 9%. Yet a couple of weeks ago when inflation reached 1.8% the government decided that this called for decisive action. The government rushed to support the Bank of Canada in its decision to hike interest rates to prevent the boom and bust effect of economic growth.

One Canadian said something to me which I think expressed the sentiment of a lot of Canadians: “Doesn't the federal government get it that for a lot of people in this country the economy has been a bust-bust economy for a good many years?” They do not recognize any signs at all or any threat of a boom and bust economy.

Canadians are asking themselves if the government feels compelled to act decisively when inflation reaches 1.8%, what level would unemployment have to reach before the government would finally act decisively on the unemployment crisis? With inflation at 1.8% and unemployment above 9% it does not take an accountant or a statistician to see which is the bigger problem.

Last week the Minister of Finance took time out from his hectic schedule of meetings with the business community to tell Canadians that the books are in the best financial shape they have been in in 26 years and that Canadians should be grateful. The Halifax Herald , the daily newspaper in my city, said it all in the headlines: “`The books are fine”, says Martin, but the real question is whether the lives of Canadians are fine”. If we look at the Liberal rhetoric and set it aside and look at the actual Liberal record, it is a very different picture.

Since the beginning of this decade 320,000 more Canadians are unemployed. The average family income has dropped by $3,000 and 52,000 more Canadians every year are declaring bankruptcy, and child poverty increased by 25%. That is not only a national disgrace, it is a national tragedy.

While the minister's friends at the BCNI applaud his slavish devotion to deinvesting in health care and education, he is not winning applause from Canadians who are battered and bruised by the single minded obsession with inflation, or from Canadians who are enduring the pain of the reduction of health care services, or from Canadians whose access to education is being blocked because of the government's withdrawal of support to education funding.

It is perverse that this government continues to use high unemployment as a deliberate strategy as a specific means to meet its targets on deficit and inflation.

The government's policy of choking off economic growth, which is why the Minister of Finance says we need to hike interest rates, is surely madness and shortsighted.

It is time once again to reinvest in our important health and education programs which after all are the key to a highly productive economy and a healthy workforce. It also is one of the most important, most efficient, most effective ways we can produce jobs.

There is no shortage of ideas on how we can produce jobs in this country. There is a severe absence of the political will to make jobs the number one priority, which Canadians desperately need this government to finally do.

What would be wrong with working together with the managers of worker pension plans to invest in environmental retrofit of both public and private buildings? The energy savings that would be effected would repay the loans from such a pension fund, enjoying a fair return to the fund. The use of fossil fuels would be reduced to protect our environment.

What would be wrong with eliminating the GST from a selection of essentials and increasing the tax credit? Such tax relief of just over $1 billion would result in the creation of 19,000 jobs, a far more effective way to achieve jobs than any proposal that has come from either the Reform Party or the Conservative Party.

What would be wrong with requiring banks to reinvest a reasonable share of their deposits in the communities where they originated? More investment in our communities means more small and medium size businesses and more jobs for unemployed Canadians.

What would be wrong with a community reinvestment act similar to that in the United States which could create as many as 60,000 jobs a year without the government's having to spend one red cent of public money?

What would be wrong with the government's recommitting itself to support social housing, co-op and non-profit housing?

We heard the Minister of Finance say last week in his statement to the finance committee that there are some things the government can and must do. Surely addressing the need for Housing when it is particularly job intensive is one thing the government must and can do.

Mr. Speaker, I want to share my time with my colleague from Qu'Appelle so I will wrap up at this point in this very important debate by referring to a forum that took place in my riding last week. It was sponsored by students at Saint Mary's University in consultation with students from throughout the Halifax metropolitan area. The forum's theme was “you have the power to make the difference, now use it”.

It is extremely gratifying that more and more students, more and more young people and their families, more of the 1.4 million unemployed Canadians, more of those who are underemployed, and there are more underemployed than unemployed, that all of these Canadians increasingly are understanding that they do have the power to make a difference and they are going to use it. We look forward to working in collaboration and in consultation with them to ensure that we make a difference in forcing this government to finally make jobs the number one priority in its economic policies.