House of Commons Hansard #59 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was colombia.

Topics

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

The hon. member does not have unanimous consent. The hon. member for Hamilton Mountain.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:05 p.m.

NDP

Chris Charlton NDP Hamilton Mountain, ON

Mr. Speaker, I did not quite realize how important it was to the member for Kings—Hants to put on the record that it was actually Chrétien's relationship with President Bush that started the free trade agreement, but I am certainly happy to confirm that. Yes, absolutely, we will set that record straight.

I am also sure that organizations like the steelworkers and the CLC will be delighted to know about the member's support for this free trade agreement.

There are a couple of other things. With respect to the letters he claims to have gotten from the Democrats and Republicans in support of this free trade agreement, I know there were also letters in opposition to the free trade agreement. While it may be right that the ILO is investigating the situation in Colombia right now, I am not sure that that investigation has come to a close.

I hope that clarifies things.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:05 p.m.

Macleod Alberta

Conservative

Ted Menzies ConservativeParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, I note that there are a lot of enthusiastic individuals in this House who would love to speak to this. We have heard many debates and certainly one of the most comprehensive debates, so no one in this House can justifiably say that this has not been debated and that the witnesses have not been to committee and argued all sides of this.

The only thing I would argue is that we probably did not have enough farmers at committee to hear how important it is to them.

However, Canada has negotiated a comprehensive and high quality free trade agreement with Colombia. Canadians can be proud of the market access provisions and the comprehensive rules that we have secured for business people to make them more competitive in this market.

Canadian companies are already active in Colombia. In 2009, two-way merchandise trade between Canada and Colombia totaled over $1.3 billion. Canadian merchandise exports to Colombia have grown by over 55% since 2004. Colombia is also clearly a strategic destination for Canadian investments which totaled over $773 million at the end of 2009. However, I am pleased to report that this free trade agreement will increase opportunities for our exporters, investors and service providers in the Colombian market.

In terms of market access, Colombia will eliminate the majority of its tariffs on all industrial products, including paper, machinery and equipment, and certain chemical products, as well as textiles and apparel.

In the agriculture sector that I referred to earlier, Colombia will also immediately eliminate tariffs on a majority of agricultural exports from Canada, including wheat, barley, peas and lentils. That is very critical, as the hon. member for Vegreville—Wainwright just told us, not only for western farmers but for farmers all across this country.

The NDP members actually suggest that they represent farmers. If they represented farmers, they would actually listen to what farmers are telling them. Farmers are dependent upon exports and dependent upon imports. We all realize that is what makes this country operate. I will retract that. Most of us in this House realize how important that is for our economy.

We continue as a government to promote free and fair trade all around the world. I have no idea why the NDP stands in this House, as our former trade minister said, in its ideological straitjacket and tries to stop good deals that promote trade and promote a strong economy.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

It being 6:13 p.m., pursuant to an order made earlier today, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the report stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on Motion No. 1. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Acting speaker Mr. Barry Devolin

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

The division on Motion No. 1 stands deferred.

The next question is on Motion No. 2. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

The recorded division on Motion No. 2 stands deferred.

The next question is on Motion No. 3. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Report stageCanada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

The division on Motion No. 3 stands deferred.

The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at the report stage of the bill.

Call in the members.

And the bells having rung:

Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation ActGovernment Orders

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Peter Milliken

The question is on Motion No. 1.

(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #66