House of Commons Hansard #179 of the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was families.

Topics

Financial Literacy Leader ActGovernment Orders

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal Party has made a very strong statement on the Auditor General, second to no other statement, saying that in positions of this nature it is a mistake not to have someone who is bilingual. I hope the Conservatives have learned a lesson on that particular issue. We will have to wait and see what they do.

In regard to the amendments, after bills pass out of second reading the Liberal Party approaches committees very seriously. We listen to what people have to say. In some bills, amendments are moved and in others they are not. With the first omnibus bill, the Liberals introduced over 400 amendments inside the House on third reading and the NDP did zero. It fluctuates. Sometimes we move amendments. It depends on the critics. A lot depends on what other amendments are being moved. Sometimes an amendment that is moved by one opposition party has the support of the other opposition party.

If there is a good idea and we feel it would make the bill better, we would support the amendment. It is unfortunate that the Conservatives did not make some of the changes some of their colleagues suggested. I suspect we might have even voted for some of those amendments. As I acknowledged at the very beginning, the bill would be just a small step in an area in which we need to make some significant steps.

Financial Literacy Leader ActGovernment Orders

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Sean Casey Liberal Charlottetown, PE

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member indicated that a key part to increasing financial literacy would be co-operation among the provinces.

When we look at the record of the Conservative government in terms of dealing with the provinces, we have a Prime Minister who will not meet with the provincial ministers as a group. We have a Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs who does all his work either in Ottawa or in Labrador. We have a Minister of Finance who says to the provinces, “Here is what you are getting for health care”. That is the Conservatives' idea of federal-provincial co-operation. We have changes to old age security that would increase the welfare rolls in the provinces; changes in EI that are going to increase the welfare rolls in the provinces; changes in crime legislation that are going to increase costs in the provinces.

Given the state of federal-provincial relations in this country, could the member explain his level of optimism that this would achieve its objective, given the necessity of working together between the provincial and federal levels of government to get it done?

Financial Literacy Leader ActGovernment Orders

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I started my speech by saying that one of the things I like about the bill is that it shows a difference between the Conservatives and the Liberal Party of Canada.

The members of the Liberal Party of Canada believe that in order to adequately deal with financial literacy in our country, in order to get the job done and get it done right, we need to work with the provinces, the different stakeholders including school divisions and so forth, and the private sector. That means having ministers who actually go out and meet with their provincial counterparts, the Prime Minister having a first ministers' meeting and so forth.

Financial Literacy Leader ActGovernment Orders

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

I regret having to interrupt the hon. member for Winnipeg North at this time. It being 1:30 p.m., the House will now proceed to the consideration of private members' business as listed on today's order paper.

The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-370, An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act (St. Lawrence Islands National Park of Canada) as reported (without amendment) from the committee.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

There being no motions at report stage, the House will now proceed, without debate, to the putting of the question on the motion to concur in the bill at report stage.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

Gord Brown Conservative Leeds—Grenville, ON

moved that, the bill be concurred in.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Canada National Parks ActPrivate Members' Business

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Acting Speaker Conservative Barry Devolin

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And five or more members having risen:

Pursuant to Standing Order 98, the recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, November 21, immediately before the time provided for private members' business.

It being 1:31 p.m., pursuant to an order made Tuesday, September 25, the House stands adjourned until Monday, November 19 at 11 a.m., pursuant to Standing Orders 28(2) and 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 1:32 p.m.)