Mr. Speaker, we had a mess to clean up. Let us be frank. When we came into government, the environmental review process was a sham. The people trying to do the work were trying to give advice to the government, but the government was not there to listen.

Through this bill we would be working with our new environmental assessment process, our new climate change targets, and putting a price on pollution. We want to have cleaner air, water and a more sustainable development of all our resources. We are going to get there together with our indigenous partners.

Mackenzie Valley Resource Management ActGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Mr. Speaker, we are all on the same page when it comes to our first nations, indigenous, Inuit and Métis people, recognizing how important the land, air, sea and water all around are to them. They work very hard to make that a priority within their communities. However, I take offence at the member saying that we are concerned about their air or their water. There is only one source of water in the world and it belongs to everyone. It is the same with our air. It is not a matter of pollution having to be taken care of in one place, otherwise B.C., with its carbon tax, would have no forest fires. Clearly, that is not the case.

The indigenous community, the first nations community want to develop their resources. Why is the current government shutting down their right to engage in resource development when they, of all people, understand the need to balance the environment and resource development in Canada?

Mackenzie Valley Resource Management ActGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have heard the hon. member across the way ask this question before. I think it is a different universe we are talking about, where we are consulting with first nations, indigenous and Métis people. I came from the Prairies. I know how important the Métis culture is and how silenced it was the development of the Prairies. Right until this day, they have not had a voice in Ottawa. Therefore, we are consulting. We are working with two ministers on the development of resources with indigenous people. We are working on a path forward.

Mackenzie Valley Resource Management ActGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Mackenzie Valley Resource Management ActGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON

Mr. Speaker, I can hear the heckling across the way. I know it is painful for them to have to look at new ways of doing things that include people. However, we are focused on including all Canadians, including our indigenous, Métis and Inuit brothers and sisters.

The House resumed from November 28 consideration of the motion that Bill C-75, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be read the third time and passed.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Liberal Anthony Rota

It being 6:30 p.m., pursuant to order made on Tuesday, November 27, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at the third reading stage of Bill C-75.

Call in the members.

During the taking of the vote:

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, we wanted to vote for the bill, but we did not hear you. We wish to vote in favour of the bill.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

Is there unanimous consent for the Bloc Québécois members to vote in favour of the bill?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #964

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

I declare the motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed.)

The House resumed from November 27 consideration of the motion that Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be read the third time and passed, and of the amendment.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

Pursuant to order made on Tuesday, November 27, 2018, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at third reading stage of Bill C-86.

The question is on the amendment. Shall I dispense?

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

6:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

[Chair read text of amendment to the House]

(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #965

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

I declare the amendment lost.

Pursuant to Standing Order 69.1, the next question is on clauses 535 to 625 regarding the Head of Compliance and Enforcement in the Canada Labour Code. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt these clauses?

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

All those in favour of these clauses will please say yea.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

All those opposed will please say nay.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2Government Orders

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And five or more members having risen: