House of Commons Hansard #14 of the 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was case.

Topics

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6 p.m.

Conservative

Cathy McLeod Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Mr. Speaker, in my speech I talked about the context. The government does have a responsibility to listen to the red flags, to listen to red flags from the Auditor General, to listen to red flags from the unions and to listen to red flags from people who have been in that role and who have experience and who express concerns about the new system.

The government is responsible for the system. It is obviously not responsible for the individual decisions that get made. However, the government has created a system that had a lot of flags that it did not respond to, and that is the government's responsibility.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Mr. Speaker, I think we are all in agreement in this House, or at least I hope we are all in agreement, that the situation that has occurred is unacceptable. The fact that a woman's life has been lost is unacceptable.

People in the sex trade should be valued, just like anyone else in our community. In this instance, clearly there have been issues related to that idea. I hope the committee will get to the bottom of this.

Beyond that, there is an underlying question that I have asked over and over again. The question is whether the current policies and laws that are in place in Canada put sex trade workers at risk. If they do, what do we need to do as parliamentarians to change those laws and put measures in place to ensure that we bring in laws to ensure sex trade workers are not put at even further risk than they are today?

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6 p.m.

Conservative

Cathy McLeod Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Mr. Speaker, we do have a very big and complex system in Canada. Today we are focused on what was clearly an issue in the parole system in either the culture or the decision-making.

I know New Democrats also have supply days. It sounds like this is a very important issue, and I would love to have further conversation about how we keep women in this country safe, regardless of who they are or what they do.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of the residents of Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, who, sadly, understand all too well what it is like to lose a friend, a family member, a loved one at the murderous hands of a convicted criminal.

My sympathy goes out to the family and friends of Marylène Levesque. She was murdered by the same man who murdered Chantale Deschenes. This man beat Chantale with a hammer, then stabbed her to death. Despite being convicted of a gruesome, misogynistic murder, this individual was given parole after only 15 years.

That we allow violent murderers on parole after such a short time troubles many Canadians. To learn that this dangerous woman-killer was encouraged by our justice system to pursue vulnerable women for his sexual gratification is horrifying. Many women feel like we have a justice system that is indifferent to violence directed at us. This case leaves us to feel like the justice system is the one directing the violence at us now. The scale of the failure in this case is enough to leave many people feeling hopeless, to despair that nothing will be fixed, that nothing will get better.

Those of us in the House do not have this option. We cannot turn away from the horror of this case and cases like it. It forces us to confront it. When will enough truly be enough for the House?

The House has already heard about Anastasia Kuzyk, Nathalie Warmerdam and Carol Culleton.

Carol Culleton had just retired from a career as a pay and benefits adviser with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Carol was also previously a small business owner, running a second-hand store with her husband. Carol lived in Ottawa but enjoyed spending the summer at her cottage on Kamaniskeg Lake near Combermere, a property which she was looking forward to selling, to downsize and simplify her life at retirement. Carol had been widowed in 2012, but had just started to find happiness with a new love, a man she described as her best friend. Carol Culleton loved and was loved.

Anastasia Kuzyk was a real estate agent in Wilno. She was known for being a hugely helpful, knowledgeable person with a great work ethic. Anastasia was a nature and animal lover. Anastasia was an accomplished equestrian who participated in numerous horse shows throughout her life, winning many ribbons and trophies. Anastasia was originally from northern Ontario, but moved to Wilno to work as a naturalist in Algonquin Park. Anastasia lived with her sister in their Wilno home. Her mother and another sister also lived in town. Anastasia Kuzyk loved and was loved.

Nathalie Warmerdam was a health care worker and volunteer. Originally from Toronto, Nathalie moved to Eganville with her husband, son and daughter in 2005. Nathalie worked in Eganville at the community care access centre and provided in-home care to recent surgical patients. Nathalie was also incredibly passionate in volunteering for co-operative police in the Killaloe area, a local community organization dedicated to securing positive changes in policing. Nathalie's 18-year-old daughter had just graduated from Opeongo High School earlier in 2015 and her 20-year-old son, Adrian, lived with her in Eganville. Nathalie was described as a beautiful person who cared about the well-being of her community. Nathalie Warmerdam loved and was loved.

On September 22, 2015, Anastasia, Nathalie and Carol were murdered by a man with a lengthy record of violently assaulting women. It is a day that will forever be burned into the memories of Ottawa Valley communities.

As horrific as that day was, it was all the days leading up to it when this irredeemable woman beater could have been stopped. The justice system and the different boards should have recognized the inherent danger his repeated history of violence against women posed. Instead, he was repeatedly set free as part of a series of events, which show how these women lived in a slow-motion horror film.

In 2010, the police arrested him for criminally harassing a woman for over a month. On the day his trial was to begin, the Crown stayed the charges.

In June 2011, he was charged with threatening to kill his soon-to-be ex-wife. Those charges would be stayed in 2012.

In July, he was arrested for assaulting another woman. Those charges were stayed in October.

On July 27, 2012, he was charged with assaulting Nathalie, threatening her son, threatening to kill the family dog, threatening to kill his ex-wife, again causing mischief to property and breaching probation orders.

When he was finally arrested on September 5, he assaulted a police officer and urinated on his jail cell walls. The assault and uttering threat charges were stayed after Borutski pled guilty to assaulting an officer and urinating. At this point, a prison rug had received more justice than multiple women. His guilty plea earned him 33 days in jail, and on January 8, 2013, he was released.

On December 30, 2013, he was charged with an assault after attacking and choking Anastasia. Since he had committed his latest attack on a woman while on probation, the Crown and judge expressed their concerns about Borutski ignoring probation orders and the increasing seriousness of his crimes. Their concerns amounted to 393 days in jail, including time served.

On December 27, 2014, he was released from jail. Only 269 days later, he would begin a killing spree that would shatter three families and devastate entire communities.

On the morning of September 22, he drove to Carol's remote cottage, and by his own admission, he chased her inside. She tried to lock the doors, but he broke through a window. He attacked her, grabbing a cable TV coil and began to choke her to death while she begged for her life. Rather than flee the scene, he lit a cigarette, smoked it and left it and his DNA in Carol's sink.

Finishing his smoke break, he resumed his murder spree. Stealing Carol's money and car, he drove to the home of his next victim, Anastasia Kuzyk. Anastasia's sister, Eva, was upstairs when she heard her sister scream. He had attacked Anastasia in her kitchen, but when confronted by the sister, he went to his car and returned with a shotgun. Eva was able to run away; Anastasia was not.

While Eva was calling the police, he was on his way to his last victim's home. Nathalie was at home with her son when Borutski arrived. Nathalie had known the type of man he was over the years and had taken steps to protect herself. She kept a shotgun under her bed. She carried a panic alarm. She had security cameras installed in her home. Those cameras recorded him walking into her home. He found her and began to chase her through the house. Her son was able to flee and call the police, but by then it was too late.

In just under two hours, three women had been stalked and murdered. The next five hours would see the largest manhunt in Ottawa Valley memory. Schools were in lockdown. Helicopters with infrared cameras searched the dense bush and extensive farm fields that make up the Ottawa Valley.

It is a day seared into the memories of each and every one of my constituents. It was the day that never should have happened but for a justice system that systematically denies justice to vulnerable women. Four times in the preceding five years he had been charged with attacking a woman, and four times the charges were stayed. He violated his probation when he attacked and choked Anastasia. Despite the court taking note of his increasing violence and his utter disregard for court orders, he was sentenced to serve an additional 160 days in jail. Does that sound just?

Chantale Deschenes was beaten with a hammer and stabbed to death. Her murderer spent only 15 years behind bars. Does that sound like justice?

Marylène Levesque was the victim of a system that showed more concern for the sexual gratification of a misogynistic murderer than for her personal security. Does that sound just? No. That is not what justice sounds like.

Let me read what Ontario Superior of Court Justice Robert Maranger said when he sentenced the man who had taken Anastasia, Nathalie and Carol's lives from us. He stated:

From time to time, a crime is so deplorable, so devoid of mercy, so cold-blooded, that denunciation, retribution and giving a sense of justice to the many victims and the community at large becomes the paramount and virtually singular consideration.

I would like to thank Justice Maranger for his words.

However, it should not take the slaying of three innocent women to remind us that serial abusers of women are not victims of society or poverty or bad parenting. They are evil men who, if given the chance, will inflict greater and greater harm on more and more women until violence against women is taken seriously. Parole boards should not let offenders out of jail before they have served their full sentences.

Mr. Borutski received 60 years. At the time of his sentencing, it was said that he would die in jail. We know only too well from recent events that only a small percentage of his sentence need be served, and the gruesomeness of this crime will be forgotten. We could again see this person on parole, and more serial murders, unless the Parole Board is fixed.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, the member really demonstrated in her remarks that the issues we are talking about today are not necessarily party-based or specifically government decisions.

Often we talk about things that take place and when something is as abhorrent as this, there is a need for us to look at it, and the government is doing just that. We are looking into it. There will be a vote on this particular motion. The level of public interest is high and I see that as a positive thing coming out of this most tragic event.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

Mr. Speaker, I wish to retract something I said earlier in the day. The proper word would have been “disrespect,” as opposed to the verb that was used.

I used the term because of the continued appearance of disrespect for women. These are not only the women who suffer at the hands of people who are let out on parole too soon by an inexperienced parole board. The member did say the government will be attacking that.

We have also seen the appearance of disrespect for women right here in the Chamber. Some members might remember “elbowgate”, an incident when the Prime Minister elbowed a member of the NDP. There was also the groping incident. The Prime Minister said the woman involved remembered it differently and that he did not know that she was national media.

All in all, I do wish to retract that statement and hope to go forward in a more collegial manner.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton

It being 6:15 p.m., pursuant to an order made earlier today, all questions necessary to dispose of the opposition motion are deemed put and a recorded division deemed requested and deferred until Wednesday, February 5, 2020, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:15 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I suspect that if you were to canvass the House you would find unanimous consent at this time to see the clock at 6:30 p.m.

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton

Is it the pleasure of the House to see the clock at 6:30 p.m.?

Opposition Motion—Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National SecurityBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

A motion to adjourn the House under Standing Order 38 deemed to have been moved.

Veterans AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

Mr. Speaker, recently I asked the Prime Minister why the Liberal Party favours the treatment of convicted terrorists over the treatment of Canadian veterans. The example I used was the decision by the government to disrespect Canadian soldiers, veterans and their families with the controversial $10.5-million payoff to convicted terrorist Omar Khadr.

At the same time, the government refuses to settle a slander case with Canadian veteran Sean Bruyea, and so far has spent seven times in legal fees what the veteran is asking for to settle.

I correctly pointed out, for the benefit of Canadians, the hypocrisy in the Liberal Party policy. The excuse the Prime Minister used to justify that $10.5-million payoff was even more lame than the ones he used during the SNC Lavalin corruption scandal.

He claimed he wanted to save on legal fees. This is a Prime Minister who promised not to take veterans to court. It appears by his actions he misspoke. He actually meant to say, not to take terrorists to court.

We know how the current leader of the Liberal Party feels about veterans. He told a veteran in Edmonton that veterans are asking for too much. That comment is two-faced coming from a Liberal Party that gave $10.5 million to convicted terrorist Omar Khadr.

Not only did the Liberal Party break that promise, it has spent $180,000 in taxpayer money fighting Canadian veteran Sean Bruyea. That amount in legal fees is over seven times more than what veteran Sean Bruyea is seeking in damages for being slandered by the government, and it gets worse.

Rather than respecting Canadians with a proper response to my question, the chief Liberal Party spokesperson gave a rambling, incoherent response that had nothing to do with the question.

Why was the federal government going to such extraordinary lengths to attack Canadian veteran Sean Bruyea? It was to intimidate him into silence. To Sean's credit, he refused to be abused by the government attacking him. In an article written for CBC News, he had this to say:

Many veterans and their families are not happy about the Khadr settlement—that much is obvious. But in the climate of vicious and partisan name-calling that seems to accompany all things Khadr, veterans' reactions are being unfairly dismissed....

At the core of the issue is benefits—specifically, the gruelling adventure race veterans have to endure to plead for their parsimonious assistance...Veterans, likewise, often have to fight years—and often decades—to receive their benefits.

...Veterans are barred from suing government for mistreatment when seeking benefits. What's more, veterans are limited to using the military's rotten veterans tribunal system, one that provides “free” lawyers employed by the very department from which veterans are trying to seek benefits.

Legal settlements in Canada do not fall under taxable income, therefore [Omar] Khadr will pay no tax on his $10.5 million...95 per cent of the benefits received by severely injured veterans and their survivors is now taxable. The court case to return to lifelong pensions continues...even though [the Prime Minister] promised to end court cases against veterans and return to lifelong pensions.

To prove permanent disability, Canadian veterans must make humiliating annual declarations that they are still missing their legs, or that their minds and spirits continue to be devoured by the lingering trauma of war.Should the most injured attempt some part-time employment for a more meaningful life, the government deducts every dollar earned. Indeed, the government already deducts pension, CPP disability, OAS and GIS from veterans' benefits. Khadr, on the other hand, gets to keep every cent of his settlement.

...But for those who have devoted their lives to defending Canada and now fight to receive their deserved compensation, watching the Canadian government simply hand over $10.5 million to someone who allegedly fought against our ally is unsettling, to say the least.

...Among [the Prime Minister's] justifications for paying Khadr was the idea that it would have cost the government more to fight than to pay. But justice, fairness, openness and transparency about a government's actions should not be dependent on how much it costs to avoid paying a debt.

...When they see such a comprehensive government action...veterans and their fellow Canadians simply can't understand the gross discrepancy.

Veterans AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

6:20 p.m.

Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook Nova Scotia

Liberal

Darrell Samson LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Mr. Speaker, I am proud to rise this evening to tell the House just how much our government values the important contributions that veterans have made to Canada and the world. Their well-being and their families' well-being is something we have supported and will continue to support as we move forward. We continue working hard to restore critical access to services and support for veterans and their families resulting from the Conservative cuts to services, the closure of Veterans Affairs offices across the country and the firing of nearly 1,000 employees from Veterans Affairs Canada.

Over the past four years, we have invested more than $10 billion in enhanced support and services for veterans and their families. This includes enhanced physical and mental health services, research into new treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder and related mental health issues, services for families, support for the transition to life after service, the veterans emergency fund, a new education and training benefit, and much more.

One of the first things we did was reopen the regional Veterans Affairs Canada offices across the country that had been shuttered by the previous government. We opened a new office in Surrey, British Columbia.

Last year, we introduced pension for life for ill and injured veterans, improving their access to care and the choices available to them. Perhaps most importantly, we listened to veterans. The minister, our caucus colleagues and I regularly engage with veterans face to face from coast to coast to coast. We hear them. One of the biggest hurdles they face is that they do not know what benefits they may be eligible for. They cannot apply for benefits that they do not know about.

We have responded. Veterans Affairs takes the initiative to inform veterans and releasing members about the services and benefits they are eligible to receive. We improved our website to make it easier for veterans to apply for benefits.

We have also streamlined how we make decisions regarding social benefits so that less complicated cases take less time. This allows for more time to examine and consider more complex cases. We triage disability claims and expedite treatment for people at risk. These changes are making a real difference, since veterans are now better informed and are using the benefits and services they have earned. Disability claims have increased by more than 60% since 2015. First applications have increased by more than 90%, and 97% of first applications for post-traumatic stress disorder were approved in the last fiscal year.

Members and veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces have earned their benefits and the right to be treated with care, compassion and respect. Our government is providing those benefits and services that they have earned. We have taken important strides in improving their health and well-being and we will continue to do so.

Veterans AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

Mr. Speaker, to conclude the quote in the article written to CBC News, “Why are those willing to make the supreme sacrifice for our country so persistently left behind?” The Prime Minister has claimed to have learned his lesson when Canadians reduced his government to a minority. Canadian veterans deserve the respect and a proper answer.

Together with my colleagues on the Veterans Affairs committee and in the Conservative Party, we will be working for the veterans of the Canadian Armed Forces and the RCMP, who we learned have no access to care for operational stress injuries. Their program has been defunded. I encourage RCMP and veterans, as well as the Canadian Armed Forces, to make contact with me and other members of my team so that we can work together, with a similar goal in mind, to ensure that there is a seamless transition when they move from the forces or the RCMP into their civilian lives.

Veterans AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Darrell Samson Liberal Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook, NS

Mr. Speaker, our government understands the importance of listening to veterans, their families and their advocates. It also understands the importance of hearing what they have to say and acting accordingly.

As I said earlier, we have invested $10 billion in enhanced benefits and services for veterans and their families. We hired more staff to give veterans better access and we have sped up the processing of applications. We have implemented critical new programs, improved services to veterans and their families, and have undertaken the hard work of reversing the destruction that the previous Conservative government brought to veterans and Veterans Affairs.

There is still work to be done. We will continue to listen to veterans' concerns and improve the way we deliver the services and benefits they so rightly deserve.

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, my constituents sent me here to fight for them and to fight for all Canadians. It is truly an honour to serve on the health committee where I can do what I came here to do: stand up for some of Canada's most vulnerable.

I would like to address the question I asked last Tuesday on behalf of a couple in Langley who were waiting for their pregnant daughter and her family to be extracted from Wuhan. I am very pleased to inform the House that the family had found a way onto a British aircraft and are now safely evacuated from the quarantine zone.

Since the last time I addressed the House, I have had dozens of Canadians with family in China contact me for help and answers. They are concerned about the availability of accurate and timely information. Currently, there is no way for families to confirm if their submitted information is properly filed. At this point, there is no way to confirm which persons will be on which plane. There is no way to confirm which permanent residents are scheduled to be repatriated. There also remains a great deal of concern regarding the travel arrangements that will be provided to unaccompanied minors who are in the care of Chinese citizens.

Yesterday, we heard at committee that there are processes in place, but based on my follow-up conversations with concerned Canadians, there still appears to be a disappointing lack of clarification. Yes, Global Affairs has reached out to those affected; however, in many cases, they are not receiving a clearly communicated plan regarding the details of their evacuation. There are still a lot of unanswered questions.

Last night, I spoke to a couple from B.C. The spouse who is a citizen has received confirmation that he will be evacuated, but the evacuation plan for the spouse who is a permanent resident has still not been communicated. I spoke with another fellow whose baby, two-year-old Gavin, will be accompanied by one or more of his grandparents who are Chinese citizens and will act as his guardians. We were assured in committee yesterday that cost will not be an obstacle for Canadians, and yet this father was asked, “What kind of health insurance do Gavin's grandparents have?”

While we are on the topic of a clearly communicated plan, I would like to share another story with the House, which was reported to me by an employee of the Vancouver Airport. This man, who I will call Jack, works for CATSA. Jack is concerned for the safety of his co-workers and passengers at the airport. He told me that, unlike CBSA, the pre-board screening officers do not have a dedicated area, nor training, nor guidance, nor identifying tools to deal with outbound passengers who may be displaying symptoms. Health Canada says that the virus is not airborne and is preventable if one washes one's hands and stays at least two metres away from potential carriers. Jack said that was not possible. Screening officers come into direct contact with passengers. Further, his employer is not providing them with face masks and had even asked that officers refrain from wearing them to avoid panic.

What concerns Canadians, as much as the lack of communication, is the delay in coming up with a plan. A week ago, many of our allies had already begun evacuating their citizens, which is why the daughter of the couple from Langley were able to get on a British plane. We were told at committee that this sort of coordinated effort is extremely complicated. While I appreciate that, it was equally complicated for the other nations to evacuate their citizens. The U.S. has just completed its last flight and we have not done our first.

Why is the government's response to this global health emergency so much slower than that of our allies, and when will every affected Canadian know how they or their families will be brought home from China?

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

6:30 p.m.

Don Valley West Ontario

Liberal

Rob Oliphant LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, I welcome this opportunity to reiterate that the Government of Canada takes safety and security of Canadians abroad and at home very seriously.

From the moment that this virus was identified as a public health risk, we have been exploring every avenue possible to assist Canadians in departing from Wuhan, China. This includes announcing that the Government of Canada has chartered an airplane to take Canadians from the affected area in China back to Canada.

Canadian officials in Ottawa and in China are working closely with their Chinese counterparts to work out all the details. We have also been collaborating with our partners to identify the best possible means to assist Canadians who wish to depart. Canadian officials are also in constant contact with our international counterparts, including the United States and the United Kingdom, to ensure co-operation and the sharing of best practices.

We have deployed the standing rapid deployment team members and other government officials to Hubei province to coordinate logistics surrounding the arrival and departure of the evacuation flight. This is a unit of specialized officials deployed during emergencies to provide critical services to Canadians who are in distress.

This situation has been evolving rapidly, and the number of Canadians asking for assistance is quickly changing. We had two requests eight days ago. As of today we have around 325 requests for departure assistance from Hubei, and that number may have changed since I got these notes.

We will do everything in our power to keep families together whenever possible. This means providing consular advice and assistance to permanent residents as well as citizens to the extent possible in the local context.

To protect the health of all Canadians, Chinese authorities will perform health screening and immigration controls before Canadians can board this special flight. Health screening will also be conducted by Canadian medical personnel before boarding, during the flight and at the final destination. Canadians appearing with symptoms will not be able to board the aircraft, and we will ensure appropriate protocols for Canadians once they arrive in Canada to protect their health and the health and safety of all Canadians.

The Government of Canada's priority is always the safety and security of Canadian citizens at home and abroad. I would like to take a moment to thank consular officials who have been working night and day on this situation. Canadians should be proud of their public servants and give them thanks for everything they have been doing all year in really extraordinary circumstances. They provide credible and timely information through our travel advice website to enable Canadians to make well-informed decisions regarding any travel abroad. Travel advisories are updated quickly to respond to events that may affect the safety of Canadians abroad. As such, on January 29 we increased our risk level to avoid non-essential travel to China due to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus.

I want to thank the member for Cloverdale—Langley City for raising this concern. It is a concern that is shared by the government. It is a concern we are hearing equally. We are responding and Canadians will be safe and kept healthy.

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

6:35 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, we are all very happy to know that a plane has been chartered. However, there are still Canadians affected by the coronavirus who have very serious and unanswered questions. Canadians should be able to rest assured that their government has their backs and can solve these types of problems quickly.

The member opposite highlighted the complexity of this sort of evacuation plan, but other countries were able to execute their plans much quicker. What can be done to reduce the complexity of this sort of operation so that in future, Canadians will no longer be jealous of other governments and their ability to handle an evacuation?

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

6:35 p.m.

Liberal

Rob Oliphant Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Mr. Speaker, Canadians can rest assured that we have their backs. We will protect them and they will be safe. We will bring them home as soon as possible.

International TradeAdjournment Proceedings

6:35 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to speak to a question I asked on December 12. The question was quite simple. I wanted to know what the Prime Minister's response was to the crisis in the auto sector.

As members know, there have been a lot of challenges, especially in my community of Oshawa. We all know what happened in Oshawa. It has been a trend over the last four years, the uncertainty for our manufacturing sector. We have seen delay after delay. For example, the original TPP was ready to be signed right after the election, but it was not signed. We almost lost CETA. We are just getting to the new NAFTA.

I hear from manufacturers over and over again about the cost of electricity, the uncertainty environmental regulations and other regulations that are unique to Canada and how that affects our competitiveness.

I asked the Liberals what their plan was. The Conservatives brought forth three motions to study the auto sector and to give the government some ideas on what could be done. Again, the Liberals voted them down.

A lot of people are concerned about the government and how serious it takes our auto sector. Everybody knows we lost our plant in Oshawa. It was not allocated new product and 2,500 jobs were lost because of that. Around the same time, Chrysler announced 1,500 job losses and Ford announced 450 job losses. That was 4,500 job losses in the auto sector alone.

In November of last year, Canada suffered the worst single month in job losses since 2009. I remember you were here, Mr. Speaker, in that great recession. During recessions and leading up to recessions, there are job losses. This is at a time when the world is expanding. However, Canada lost 71,200 jobs in November and 27,500 of those job losses were in our manufacturing sector. That is the biggest job loss in years.

It is very timely that the parliamentary secretary is here. Right now, we are debating the new NAFTA. People who have interest in the auto sector want to find out what this will mean. We have asked the Liberals for a cost-benefit analysis and they are still not forthcoming. In this agreement, it is the first time Canada agreed to ideas of quotas in the automotive sector. We really want to know what that will cost.

We have new rules for the aluminum sector. Aluminum is a big part of automotive sector. It is used to build cars. There is concern about circumvention from Chinese aluminum through Mexico. The Liberals seem to forget this is about people.

I remember when the announcement was made in Oshawa. Our leader was there. He was at the gates, talking to workers, seeing what we could do to help, showing support. Unfortunately, the Liberals did not even show up. The Prime Minister did not even call our mayor for two weeks, and only after increased pressure from me in the House, as well as from other members.

People in the auto sector deserve an explanation. We would like to know how much the new NAFTA will increase the cost of cars. With jobs in Mexico now at $16 per hour, how many of those jobs will move north? What is the advantage in this agreement for jobs to stay in Canada instead of the United States?

International TradeAdjournment Proceedings

6:40 p.m.

Willowdale Ontario

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, allow me to emphasize that our government is squarely focused on ensuring that Canadians have access to good, well-paying jobs. Manufacturing has traditionally been an excellent source of such types of jobs, especially in the auto sector.

This government has always supported the auto workers and the auto sector. Through the innovation and skills plan, we have shaped a policy environment designed to strengthen the competitiveness of the Canadian industry. We have also established the strategic innovation fund, ensuring this flagship program is an effective tool for attracting new investments to Canada.

To cite one example for my good friend, we might as well talk about Linamar, which, after we introduced this program, has reinvested. Of course, it is a company that is very much a part of the auto supply chain.

We fully recognize that we have more work to do and have a plan that will make a concrete difference. Automotive manufacturing is the touchstone of Canada's economy. We want to invest in innovation and skills development today so Canadians and Canadian companies can succeed in the economy of tomorrow.

Since the beginning of 2016, the Government of Canada has leveraged $454 million to support the automotive industry, which has announced over $6.7 billion in new investments in Canada. We support the research and development that will lead to the next generation of transportation. We are seeing the sector adjust by meeting the demands for the vehicles of the future, vehicles that will be connected, automated, shared and electric.

Going forward, we are committed to addressing climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors, including the transportation sector. Advances in vehicle technologies, such as zero-emission vehicles, have the potential to enhance the productivity, efficiency and environmental performance of Canada's transportation system, as well as drive innovation and economic growth.

Canada retains a mature automotive sector and we are building expertise in advanced technologies, a highly skilled workforce and strong R and D capacity.

All of this is part of our comprehensive plan to ensure that Canada is successful in the future economy, in the auto industry and indeed in every industry. We believe passionately in Canada's automotive manufacturers and the quality of the vehicles produced by Canadian workers.

International TradeAdjournment Proceedings

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

Mr. Speaker, the member will get no argument from me on that. Unfortunately, we lost our assembly plant in Oshawa. It had some of the best quality vehicles manufactured in the world, but we still lost it.

I would ask the member this. What is the government's plan? What is its strategy? We have the automotive action plan. I know, Mr. Speaker, you even had input in putting that through. However, the member does not seem to realize that in November, there were 27,500 manufacturing job losses. I was talking to him about the 2,500 job losses in Oshawa. There were 1,500 at Chrysler and 450 at Ford. Now we have this new NAFTA.

The parliamentary secretary is here so I was wondering this. The government would not have signed an agreement without a cost-benefit analysis. What is this new NAFTA deal going to do to increase the cost of cars for Canadians and affect the competitiveness of Canadians? How many jobs are going to be brought to Canada because of the new agreement?

International TradeAdjournment Proceedings

6:40 p.m.

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON

Mr. Speaker, as I am sure the member is fully aware, from day one our government was in constant contact with Unifor and General Motors Canada to push for better outcomes.

As I emphasized earlier, our government is passionately committed to investing in innovation and skills development to ensure that Canadians and Canadian companies are prepared to succeed in the economy of the future. Our investments in innovation, through the innovation and skills plan, have helped bolster Canada's robust automotive cluster by supporting reinvestments in Canadian vehicle assembly plants by global automakers. We will continue to believe strongly in Canada's automotive manufacturers and the quality of the vehicles produced by Canadian workers.

International TradeAdjournment Proceedings

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton

The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 2 p.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 6:45 p.m.)