Agriculture committee   food exports have grown 77% over the last 10 years, 20% from 2013 to 2015 alone, to $56 billion annually. The United States alone accounts for $29 billion. We rank as the number one supplier of agriculture and agrifood products to the U.S., which is the world's second largest

Softwood Lumber  . The last Liberal government helped itself to $56 billion of that money. The Liberals have done that in the past. Forestry workers want to work, not collect employment insurance. Giving them more employment insurance cheques will not create jobs. Signing an agreement with the Americans

International Trade committee   of NAFTA and the Canada-U.S. Trade Agreement, Canada's agrifood exports have grown by five times, from $10 billion in 1988 to $56 billion in 2016—a five-fold increase since the beginning of NAFTA. Together, the U.S. and Mexico represent a little over half of Canada's agrifood exports

Finance committee   in the crown corporations' plans, meaning $43 billion over the next three years, and a contingency reserve of 5%, which is $56 billion. The total equals the amount established.

Finance committee   years. This number represents $43 billion. To this number, we add a contingency margin equal to 5%. The 5% is taken from the highest level of the combined government and crown corporation debt over the next three years. The amount we're adding is $56 billion for the next three

Agriculture committee   growth and increasing consumer demand for the Canada brand. The federal government's budget for 2017 includes the objective to grow Canada's annual agrifood exports from $56 billion per year to $75 billion per year by 2025. All indications are clear that there is enough demand

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, simply put, when we look at what the Conservative government did after coming into power, we see it put $56 billion toward paying down the debt and cut taxes, which allowed the Canadian economy to be already ready when the financial crisis in 2006-07

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2   northern colleges, to take adults who may not be literate and upgrade them to the next stage. It is about $56 billion for the three colleges that cover half of northern Canada. That would be a great project to fund in the new budget.

Finance committee   $56 billion in goods and services from our stores, resulting in over $21 billion in tax revenue for governments. Our pre-budget recommendations for 2017 are focused around three challenges facing our industry. I will start with credit card swipe fees, which remain for Canada's

International Trade committee  . This is why international trade is critical to our industry. The TPP represents a huge opportunity for Canada. We know that TPP countries represent nearly 800 million potential customers and account for 40% of the world's GDP and 65% of Canada's $56 billion in agriculture and food trade

Finance committee   to over $56 billion, and that has boosted farm cash receipts by almost 50% over the same period. Agriculture is the third-largest single contributor to our GDP, 8% of the total GDP employment, one out of every eight jobs. Agriculture, out of all the industries, has a tremendous track

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, who are we going to believe on this one: Liberals who say that the only solution to fix the Canadian economy is to raid the EI fund again? They took $56 billion out of it the first time around when they were in office. I guess they got used to the habit of just

Business of Supply   in that whatsoever. We simply run the program. That purging of the system has to stop. There was $56 billion that was stolen from workers. They need to return it now.

Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1  Mr. Speaker, my colleague's fantastic speech really highlights the comparison and contrast between the NDP's plan and our plan. I am wondering if my colleague could comment on this. The NDP has made, I think it is $56-billion worth of unfunded promises, and so far we know

Economic Action Plan 2015 Act, No. 1   and fits together. When it comes to this long list of things the hon. member talked about, there is no plan in anything New Democrats say about how they will actually pay for them. After the last election, they had something like $56 billion in increased spending. It sounds as though