Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 107
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Income Tax Amendments Act, 1999   will benefit from these measures, low income earners will have the most to gain. For example, under the 1999 budget measures a single filer earning $15,000 will pay 15% less federal tax while a similar individual earning $30,000 will pay 6% less tax. I have more examples. A typical one

April 6th, 2000House debate

Roy CullenLiberal

Income Tax Act Amendments, 1999   by a further $175. Bill C-25 eliminates the general 3% surtax for all taxpayers. Standing to benefit the most from these measures are low income earners. A single filer with an income of $15,000 for example will pay 15% less federal tax, while a similar person earning $30,000 will pay 6

June 7th, 2000House debate

Roy CullenLiberal

Canada Health Act   contributions that some provinces are receiving less than 15%. Less than 15% of their health care costs, in some cases, is derived from the federal government. Now I am putting out a little feeler. Maybe we should seriously start considering changing our Constitution so that we in fact have

November 22nd, 2002House debate

Ken EppCanadian Alliance

Supply  , and the figures are there, for at least 15% less if it is in a publicly delivered system. It is shameful that members of the Conservative Party, who at one time were reform and then alliance, who try to present themselves as the grassroots people and the protectors of the public purse

May 11th, 2004House debate

Bev DesjarlaisNDP

Supply   in place will deliver 14% to 15% less cost to the taxpayer? Let us say the provinces make a decision to provide this through public delivery because it will be cheaper. Will my colleague acknowledge that this is what we should do with taxpayer dollars? Will he agree that we should use

May 11th, 2004House debate

Bev DesjarlaisNDP

Supply   $29,000. In Saskatchewan it was almost $5,000 below that, over 15% less. Saskatchewan faces challenges. Its population has increased 14% since the Great Depression, while other provincial populations have flourished. With major industries in crisis, a static population and mounting

March 22nd, 2005House debate

Carol SkeltonConservative

Justice committee   is not out on the street. Again, this is anecdotal evidence. We have studies. For example, I mentioned the study that showed that incarcerating a person for one year for a serious offence prevented the commission of 15 less serious offences that individual would have committed during

September 19th, 2006Committee meeting

Vic ToewsConservative

Bill C-24 Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006

First Session, Thirty-ninth Parliament, 55 Elizabeth II, 2006 STATUTES OF CANADA 2006CHAPTER 13 An Act to impose a charge on the export of certain softwood lumber products to the United States and a charge on refunds of certain duty deposits paid to the United States, to authoriz

December 14th, 2006
Bill

David EmersonConservative

Persons with Disabilities   they gained in earning ability without disabilities between the years 1999 and 2004. The average earnings of people with disabilities remain substantially lower than those without disabilities. In 2004, average earnings for people with disabilities were $30,700 a year, almost 15% less

February 21st, 2007House debate

Karen RedmanLiberal

Persons with Disabilities   were $30,700. This is 15% less than people who were in the job market without disabilities. Late last year, the United Nations adopted a landmark convention on the rights of people with disabilities and the convention focuses on the rights and development of people

April 16th, 2007House debate

Karen RedmanLiberal

Public Accounts committee  According to the procedures of the House, we should report this to the House. The motion I'm going to invite the committee to consider is shall vote 15, less $17,860,250 granted in interim supply, carry? Is someone prepared to make that motion?

May 16th, 2007Committee meeting

The ChairLiberal

Finance committee   ridings. What most people don't know is that 10% to 15% of book prices is a regulated royalty, paid to multinational distributors. A typical textbook, which can cost $100, could cost $10 to $15 less if the government were to eliminate a regulatory protection that does nothing

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Chris Tabor

Public Accounts committee   the bid came in at 15% less than what had happened before. So we're happy with that. But now that the contract has been awarded, we have some difficulty because we have a lobbyist on the Hill--and I'm not shy in stating that it's Mr. Boudria, who is acting on behalf of Envoy. He's been

November 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Daryl KrampConservative

Justice   the government did not do its homework. That is 15% less convictions, offenders serving one-third less time, all at 16 times the cost. How much evidence do the Conservatives need before they realize that their costly prisons agenda is not making communities safer in Canada?

February 28th, 2012House debate

Jack HarrisNDP

Ethics   are actually spending 15% less than the Liberals did.

April 24th, 2012House debate

Peter Van LoanConservative