Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 87901-87915 of 139272
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Health committee  -slaughter inspectors there were prior to the listeria outbreak. I simply don't have that number with me here today. Those are two very different things. The agency, in its work around inspection and increasing inspection capacity, has made this a very clear area of focus. When we speak

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Paul Mayers

Transport committee  So I will do it. This is the Minister, Benoît Pelletier, and the former Minister, Claude Béchard, who was responsible for this issue in the Government of Quebec. For those listening, and so what we are saying will be clear, I am going to read the following document. The letter

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Richard NadeauBloc

Natural Resources committee  That's not my area of expertise, but I think Canada's energy security is certainly enhanced when we have a clear picture of our reserves and our energy potential. How the Government of Canada matches that up with security is really up to the elected officials.

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Robert Cadigan

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, what is quite clear is that the member read the wrong speech today. He read a speech based on a different sale. It is driving him crazy that the 13 Saskatchewan members in the Conservative caucus have been able to do more since 2006 than the member and his party

November 4th, 2010House debate

Paul CalandraConservative

Business of Supply   sector in the order of magnitude as the Potash case. This is the first one that has been this big, and we have been very clear about our position on the case of Potash. We have also indicated that the major takeovers of large chunks of Canadian natural resources, whether

November 4th, 2010House debate

Ralph GoodaleLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, of course not. The point is that the government has been trying on this issue to have it all ways to Sunday and not to be clear with Canadians about where it wanted to go. We heard that in the answer that was given by the Prime Minister two weeks ago yesterday when

November 4th, 2010House debate

Ralph GoodaleLiberal

Transport committee  I want to be very clear in my mind. Mr. Dubé, what does this amendment mean? Is it meant to keep or remove the right of expropriation within the boundaries of the park?

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Marcel ProulxLiberal

Natural Resources committee   regarding the federal government's policy responses post-BP. It's only now becoming clear that there are discussions between the Government of Quebec, the Government of New Brunswick, the Government of P.E.I., and the federal government over shared jurisdiction. As these are matters

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

William Amos

Transport committee  Actually it goes beyond that, because the first part of proposed section 12 deals with any land in the national capital region, and that intends to cover any federal projects that will be on lands in the region. So it's already clear in the rest of proposed section 12 that all

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Simon Dubé

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I wonder if my colleague could expand on his point about the importance of strengthening the Investment Canada Act to ensure that approvals of foreign takeovers actually benefit workers and their communities. To be clear, the NDP is not against foreign investment

November 4th, 2010House debate

Claude GravelleNDP

Business of Supply   losses. We have seen the copper refining capacity of Ontario shut down. Ore is being shipped out of the region. I would like to ask our leader a question regarding potash. It is pretty clear, is it not, that the people of Saskatchewan and the people of Canada put the government

November 4th, 2010House debate

Charlie AngusNDP

Business of Supply   for the right price. That is what the experts are saying. They are identifying that these other countries are coming up with industrial strategies. It is clear that Canada does not have that type of philosophy and we are failing because of it. I want to finish with a bit of discussion

November 4th, 2010House debate

Brian MasseNDP

Government Operations committee  They didn't know that if they closed they wouldn't qualify? It wasn't clear as to who would or wouldn't qualify? They said if you show us the last few years' business and you show...? Is that the case? It's very confusing.

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Olivia ChowNDP

Government Operations committee  In fairness, it was clear that if you chose to close your business—if you made the decision to board up and just stay closed the entire time—you would not receive compensation. What was surprising was that, because of some of the violence and some of the risks that we saw

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Justin Taylor

Government Operations committee  The guidelines aren't clear on that. It just says that you had to remain open during the G-20 summit.

November 4th, 2010Committee meeting

Justin Taylor