Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 95956-95970 of 138752
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to try to do what I can, this morning, to make your life easier. I withdraw my notice of motion. I'm supporting Mr. Pacetti's motion, while repeating that Mr. Pacetti was clear, in fact extremely so. The facts were reported in the newspapers. I'm

June 16th, 2009Committee meeting

Thomas MulcairNDP

Finance committee  Well, let's deal with the real world rather than ideology. The forestry sector is in transformation, it's changing. The people in the forestry sector made that clear to me when I prepared the budget, not just this year but in previous years. We have to deal

June 16th, 2009Committee meeting

Jim FlahertyConservative

Environment committee  There have been two or three attempts to set up what I'd call larger data clearing-house activities, but most of them have failed as a result of a lack of human resources and financial resources. I want to make a comment about RAMP. RAMP has been a program that has gone

June 16th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. D. George Dixon

Citizenship and Immigration committee   and needs a travel document to be able to travel to Canada, we will issue a single-journey travel document to facilitate the travel to Canada, because the ultimate intent is clear. The intent is to sponsor the child as a permanent resident and put her on that track to permanent residency

June 16th, 2009Committee meeting

Rick Stewart

Finance committee  , but we do not know in dollars and cents how much money has actually been spent, let alone how many jobs have been created or saved. Why do Americans deserve this transparent, clear information that Canadians do not seem to be entitled to? Would you, Minister, be able to provide us

June 16th, 2009Committee meeting

John McCallumLiberal

Canadian Human Rights Act   specialists and public servants. Although these men and women came from remarkably diverse backgrounds and represented a broad variety of interests, the support for the repeal of section 67 was virtually unanimous. While this government took a clear and unambiguous approach to the repeal

May 16th, 2008House debate

Harold AlbrechtConservative

House debate  , we are focused on the economy. The opposition is focused on throwing up roadblocks instead of getting roads built. This last weekend my constituents made it clear that they want politicians to stop playing political games and get to work on their behalf. I suspect that hon

June 15th, 2009House debate

Andrew SaxtonConservative

Business of Supply   of Joe Clark, suggesting that perhaps there should be a little more local autonomy. What has happened to their position on local autonomy in this case, particularly when it is not really clear that this is a good idea? If this were such a great idea, we would think the previous

June 15th, 2009House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I have always thought that the securities commissions were there to protect the public from being taken advantage of by improper business overtures, not merely to save the business community some money on compliance costs. The clear message we have received from

June 15th, 2009House debate

Jim MalowayNDP

Business of Supply  . That is contrary to the interests of Quebec and to the responsibilities assigned to it and to all the provinces. It jeopardizes everything. We must face up to this because Ontario’s intentions are clear: it wants only one regulator. It did not participate, however, in the passport system

June 15th, 2009House debate

Serge CardinBloc

Business of Supply   and effectiveness of Canada's regulatory system. Through these initiatives, the provinces have indicated that they wanted to work together, respecting all jurisdictions, as part of a clear commitment to improve our securities regulatory system. Even though those initiatives are laudable

June 15th, 2009House debate

Steven BlaneyConservative

Business of Supply   securities commission, with the support of the Liberals in this House, despite the clear, unanimous opposition of the Quebec National Assembly. I mentioned the Liberals' support because if they do not vote, we only have to do the math to know that there are enough Conservatives to beat

June 15th, 2009House debate

Guy AndréBloc

Justice committee   beliefs that some judges will be excluded behind the idea that the right to be understood has to be protected. With that in mind, the only question I have for the lawyers is this: is it perfectly clear, after the three cases that Mr. Michaud mentioned, that according to Canadian law

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Brian MurphyLiberal

Business of Supply   but there is also an opportunity to encourage investment in this country. We have heard loud and clear that there are opportunities for investment in many industries so they can expand. Just like we want to we Canadian companies invest outside of Canada, we need to have an environment

June 15th, 2009House debate

Ted MenziesConservative

Justice committee  In order to understand the subtleties of the law and apply them in full, one must at least understand both official languages. Thus, it is now clear that language proficiency is essential in order to serve as a judge. We must therefore see to it. My bill will do nothing

June 15th, 2009Committee meeting

Yvon GodinNDP