Ethics  Mr. Speaker, the RCMP has been clear. Two individuals are under investigation, and our government is co-operating fully. Canadians do not agree with the Liberal Party, which is protecting senators who break the rules.

Ethics   again, I was told that Mr. Duffy would repay them. I was told he had repaid them, not anybody else. I could not be clearer on that fact. Those are the facts. Of course, as we know, that was not true, and that is why two individuals are under investigation.

Ethics  , and that is why those two individuals are under investigation.

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, it is obviously up to the RCMP to conduct the investigations. As the RCMP has been very clear, we have been providing them with any and all access to the information that is necessary. The RCMP has made clear that there are two individuals who are under

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, that statement is totally false. The RCMP has said that there are two individuals who are under investigation. When the Leader of the Opposition starts tarnishing the names of people who face no allegations whatsoever, I am reminded once again of the old saying

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, there are two individuals who are under investigation, and there are a number of senators who broke rules or who disregarded rules. Those senators have been dealt with harshly by the Senate of Canada, by the Conservative senators in the Senate of Canada. It is up

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, once again the facts here are that Mr. Duffy claimed he had repaid his inappropriate expenses when in fact he had accepted a gift from Mr. Wright. That gift was not properly disclosed and was in fact misrepresented. That is why those two individuals are under

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, the record is very clear. From all documents, the sole responsibility for these actions rests with Mr. Wright and with Mr. Duffy. That is why these two individuals are under investigation. Mr. Wright has accepted his responsibility and co-operated fully

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, once again, the documents make clear there are two individuals who are under investigation, Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy, as has been said from the outset of this affair. Let me say specifically, what the RCMP says about the PMO. The RCMP investigator reports that he

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, what I can say is that Mr. Wright repaid Mr. Duffy's expenses, although the two of them let it be known, to the contrary, that it was Mr. Duffy himself who had repaid his expenses. That was obviously not the appropriate thing to do. That is why those two

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, if the Leader of the Opposition wants to cite the RCMP, he would note that it is these two individuals who are under investigation for what was an improper payment, I think something Mr. Wright himself admits. That is the appropriate thing, that those who undertook

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, once again, what the RCMP has confirmed in its documents today is that two individuals, Mr. Duffy and Mr. Wright, are under investigation for their actions in this matter and it has also confirmed that this Prime Minister has been telling exactly the truth.

Ethics   Mr. Wright that Mr. Wright had not been forthcoming about. That is the responsibility of those two individuals. Mr. Wright has taken responsibility. Those two individuals are under inquiry and investigation. It is very different than the leader of the NDP, who for 17 years knew

Ethics  , it was unacceptable that this was done, and particularly that I was not informed and my permission to do such a thing was never sought. I obviously would never have given it, and for that reason these two individuals have faced sanctions.

Public Works and Government Services  Mr. Speaker, the Bloc member mentioned the names of two individuals of Greek origin, namely one employee who works here in Ottawa, and another who is a Conservative Party supporter, in Montreal. The fact that there are two Montrealers of Greek origin does not mean