Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Criminal Code Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Earlier today, under tabling of documents, I indicated that the government was responding to 10 petitions. However, I should have said 11 petitions.
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Criminal Code Mr. Speaker, we recognize at the outset why we have this legislation. This legislation is the result of a Supreme Court of Canada decision that was unanimous by all nine judges. The decision sets out the legal framework. We have talked a great deal about the importance of palli
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Questions on the Order Paper Mr. Speaker, Question No. 105 will be answered today.
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns Mr. Speaker, if Questions Nos. 104 and 106 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled immediately.
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns Mr. Speaker, I ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Government Response to Petitions Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 10 petitions.
May 31st, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Ethics Mr. Speaker, I will respond as I did at the beginning of my remarks in response to her question. It is amazing how the member feels she can come into the chamber and assassinate the character of an individual Canadian who has done so much in serving his province and the country.
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Ethics Mr. Speaker, the first thought that comes across my mind is, wow, what a job on character assassination. It is a good thing the member is standing inside the chamber. I wonder if she would have the courage to say outside the chamber some of the things she has put on the record in
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Mr. Speaker, I would like to be clear on a critical message. The Government of Canada is committed to supporting the dedicated and proud members of Canada's national police service. Bill C-7 would allow RCMP members and reservists to choose whether they wish to be represented b
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Mr. Speaker, the member seems to be somewhat confused with regard to the issue of urgency. We need to recognize that when the Supreme Court of Canada makes a decision, all members have a responsibility to respect that decision. The two bills the member had made reference to are i
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Mr. Speaker, I am somewhat surprised and definitely disappointed that the New Democratic Party has not recognized the principle of the legislation. The Government of Canada has said that it is committed to supporting our persons in both the regular force and the reserves of the R
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Madam Speaker, could the member be clear and decisive in terms of why he believes that the RCMP should have the secret ballot? His vote later on today will clearly indicate that his party is against the bill. In principle, this legislation would establish a union for the RCMP.
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Madam Speaker, I wonder if my colleague could comment on the principle of unionization. The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that our RCMP members should have the ability to organize for collective bargaining, and we see that as a positive thing. Many police agencies across
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Madam Speaker, I would ask the member to reflect why we have the legislation before us today and to recognize how important it is that the legislation passes in a timely fashion. It is because of the Supreme Court, but it is also the right thing to do given the importance of the
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Public Service Labour Relations Act Madam Speaker, I have a very simple question for the member. Here we have legislation that would allow RCMP members to unionize. Why, in principle, would the member not support the legislation that would enable that to happen?
May 30th, 2016House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal