Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1546-1560 of 1565
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Supply  Yes, Mr. Speaker, it is true. I think that is why back home I have heard so many responses and received so much support from Albertans. They can relate directly to how important their resources sector has been to their economic self-sufficiency. When they heard what happened with

November 4th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, when equalization was first brought forward in 1957, non-renewable natural resources were not in the formula so that obviously was of benefit to Alberta at the time. As we know, it collects a great deal in oil revenues. I think the most important thing was in a rece

November 4th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, absolutely. This is part of the Constitution. As the member knows, we have absolute respect for the Constitution. The Conservative Party has always viewed and will continue to view equalization as an essential component of Canada's nation-building efforts. We will co

November 4th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Supply  Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the Leader of the Opposition for raising this motion and also the member for St. John's East for advocating so forcefully on this issue. I would like to start by reading excerpts from letters that were sent from Premier Williams to the Prime Minister

November 4th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Softwood Lumber  Mr. Speaker, Canadian lumber producers are trying to survive in an increasingly hostile environment caused by rising fuel costs and a stronger Canadian dollar. In the meantime, the Liberals continue to insult our best clients and our producers are paying the price for this bad be

November 2nd, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Equalization Payments  Mr. Speaker, at the Standing Committee on Finance this morning, the finance minister admitted that the current equalization deal that is on the table for Newfoundland and Labrador has a cap on revenues. This statement directly contradicts the Prime Minister and the Minister of Na

October 28th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Equalization Payments  Mr. Speaker, amendments had to be made to the Speech from the Throne in order to force the Prime Minister to recognize the reality of the fiscal imbalance. Once again, instead of straight talking he is hiding behind the formula. Will the Prime Minister be more straightforward, d

October 28th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Supply  Madam Speaker, I have a hard time understanding how the member can claim the fiscal imbalance does not exist when we have a $9.1 billion surplus and we are living in a country made up of mostly have not provinces right now. My problem with the way the federal government deals wi

October 28th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Supply  Madam Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the member for St. John's East. As the member for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot and members of the House know, the Conservative Party believes a fiscal imbalance exists in the country, and we support the motion. We also know the Liberal gov

October 28th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Canadian Heritage  Mr. Speaker, the government appears to be confused. Last month the Minister of Canadian Heritage stated that when she is at international meetings her Quebec better half can speak for her on Canadian cultural policy. She said, “Line can speak for both of us very well”. The herita

October 14th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Canadian Heritage  Mr. Speaker, the minister is obviously still confused. The Minister of Canadian Heritage is on record as saying that Quebec can speak for Canada on Canadian cultural policy, but her colleagues, the Minister of Transport and the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, have clearly

October 14th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Health  Mr. Speaker, in the pre-election euphoria, the Prime Minister pretended to be the great defender of the public health system, stating that there was no room for a pay as you go health care system. Yesterday, a private clinic opened its doors in the Prime Minister's adopted city.

October 13th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Health  Mr. Speaker, this is another case of say one thing and do another. This is hypocrisy on health care. During the election the Prime Minister said: To break your promises in terms of health care...is really a terrible thing. I could not agree more. Breaking promises is a terrible

October 13th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Agriculture  Mr. Chair, as the hon. member said, we need to increase the capacity to slaughter and pack livestock in our country so there is more reliability for the agriculture industry. In my riding of Edmonton—Spruce Grove, a former member of the House, Stan Schellenberger, is spearheadin

October 12th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Mr. Speaker, this is a very important issue in regard to federal-provincial relations. The problem arises when the federal government has its own agenda and policy objectives. It is often rare that these objectives actually coincide with the policy objectives of the provinces. W

October 12th, 2004House debate

Rona AmbroseConservative