Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 133
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Right, but we're here together today—

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  —on a specific subject. Pardon me?

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Right, so you let him come in and make that statement but you won't even give us equal time.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Everybody watching now has all the information that they need, Mr. Chairman. They understand that the government is using its majority, with their Liberal henchmen, to try to call the official opposition to account. It's unprecedented. But do you know what? Since we've shown yo

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  What we're both referring to are the dozens of documents that refer to the fact that people were being hired in the Montreal office.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  They're from 2011. They're from 2012. They're from 2014. They always mention the Montreal office. When the rule was changed on April 8, 2014, we respected the new rule, the same way we respected the existing rules prior to that date, Mr. Casey. There's never been a problem. Their

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll try to kill two birds with one stone, because of course it wouldn't be very fair to us not to let us answer Mr. Lukiwski. With regard to the government continuing to use its majority, that's all this is about. The government used its majority at t

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Well, thank you, Mr. Chair, but given the stunt that you've just allowed from that side, I should at least be given a chance to respond.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Chair, I would appreciate it if Mr. Woodworth were to provide Anne McGrath, our party general secretary, with his address so we can share the fee of our attorneys. I thank him for proving our case for us. It's exactly that. This rule was brought in so that as of April 14, 2

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The rule came into force on April 8, 2014, effective April 14, 2014, and we've been obeying it since it came into force.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  You can just imagine if somebody were to create a penalty after the fact for something that you've already done that wasn't, up until then, an offence. That's the essence of the argument on the Conservative side of this discussion today. The reason that the new rule was brought

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It is intriguing to ask that question, because you can immediately imagine that Conservatives heading for third if not fourth party status, and Liberals heading for maybe third party status, if they're lucky, could want to bring back a rule on the dissolution of the next Parliame

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  No, Dan Quinn is a party worker.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I haven't seen it. But as I've mentioned many times before, it's an office paid for 100% by the party.

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair

May 15th, 2014Committee meeting

Thomas Mulcair