Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 42
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Citizenship and Immigration committee  “Out of jurisdiction” would probably mean that it's strictly decision-based. There's no conduct involved in it. “Loss of jurisdiction” would mean that the individual fully retired and is gone, or died.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It depends on what the evidence is, but this process would not be prevented because of that. That's correct.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  You're welcome. Thank you very much for your interest in the council. I really appreciate it. It's the council who actually sent me.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I was just going to say that it is a small office. If you're going to recommend something, I would recommend maybe that you go a little bit bigger. I am the registrar, so I oversee day-to-day operations. I provide legal advice and legal services to both councils. I support all of

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I don't think I can answer that question. I'd have to really think about that. I'd be reluctant to answer that on the fly. I am, after all, a lawyer. I'd need to think about that.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's actually very analogous. I would say there are really two key differences. The Judicial Council has one more level of review, so it has a level of review that does the investigation and it reports to a middle level of review that has four members of that council on it. Then

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I'm just going to refer to the annual report for that year.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I think it's pretty similar. In 2016, for example, there were approximately 498 justices of the peace on the bench, and there would probably be a similar number—under 400 but more than 300—judges on the bench, so there would be 300 to 400 of each category.

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  There was a complaint—although it didn't go through to a hearing because the justice of the peace fully retired, and if they leave office we lose jurisdiction—that did come forward to the start of a public hearing and it was an allegation of incompetence as a result of a pattern

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  No, that isn't correct. The annual report includes every complaint that comes in the door and is within the jurisdiction of the council. Even if it's dismissed, it's described in there. If it's not ordered to a public hearing, the legislation says that the names of the complainan

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Yes. The list of dispositions is what I had indicated. It can be either a dismissal.... If there's no merit to it or it doesn't amount to really much.... A lot of them are decision based as well. They really want to change the decision, and there's no real conduct there. Those wo

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I'd have to say that we've never measured that, because it really varies. If it's a very straightforward one that requires one court transcript, for example, maybe that would just take a few months, but it can be more complicated, a very long proceeding that requires many transcr

April 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Marilyn King