Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 26
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Veterans Affairs committee  That's a loaded question, but fair enough. Regarding the mentally damaged veterans, that issue--I believe I'm right in saying--is under appeal, is it not?

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  So if we brought an ombudsman on, he's certainly not going to get involved with the court process.

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  Whether he could deal with something, going back to your earlier example, sir, where you were talking about Agent Orange, which in fact is still in the working stage, that would be a different matter, but I think once the courts take over too many hands are tied. That's the purv

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  I would just say, going back to one of your earlier questions, sir, that you and your colleagues are absolutely right. We have had in British Columbia, where I'm from, an ombudsman for more than 35 years. It's the same thing in Ontario. This is not new in Canada. Today we have ou

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  We trashed that. We did not agree with that. That was the Legion advocating and purporting to speak for people they did not speak for.

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  Several times. In fact, this afternoon we again went through the department's latest submission, did the same, and said you've made a reasonable start, but it's now back to step two--start again. They're starting to get the message that the veterans bill of rights has to be in a

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  We can, but it's in rough form. They gave us a questionnaire of twelve questions that we had not seen until Friday—

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  We have, but that's been succeeded by this latest round of documents. When we were here in April, the draft we tabled was met with general consensus around the table. People said it's not perfect but we're quite comfortable with it. Then we made the mistake of going to the legal

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  I absolutely reinforce what my president has said. We can't afford to wait for three, four, or five years before we have something in place, because unfortunately, as you know, there were two Canadian soldiers killed yesterday, and their families are going to have to be looked af

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  I have nothing to add.

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  The Legion purports to speak for us all. It does not. Even within their own senior command structure, the positions they've taken at the dominion level have been challenged on their floor and in writing. Tom referred earlier to a very strong position that was taken by Ontario Com

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  I'm heartened by your comments. When we were working on the new Veterans Charter it was not exposed to a committee such as this, for a whole bunch of reasons. The honourable members didn't have an opportunity, and it went through. We all know it was passed in a single day, and al

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  I would think that another major area of concern, and I can't define it in a brief paragraph, would be, as I mentioned earlier, the interface with the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Canadian Forces when a wounded individual moves across from being a Canadian Forces member

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner

Veterans Affairs committee  It was the previous government.

November 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Larry Gollner