Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-8 of 8
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  One of the things the criminal justice section has tried to be cautious about is treading too far into the more scientific areas, because we're not scientists; we're lawyers who have to understand certain aspects of science in order to do our jobs. So I cannot say that we've look

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  True, but I know Mr. Hodgson and Ms. Treacy have both made reference to the idea that when we're dealing with alcohol, it's one thing. When we're dealing with drugs, it's a different animal altogether. The concern of the criminal justice section is that we seem to be trying to

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  Yes. The section's position wouldn't change in terms of being opposed to removing or curtailing that defence. We would suggest that the availability of that record would enhance and add a layer of objectivity, or an additional layer of objectivity, to the calling of the defence.

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  The short answers are yes, yes, and yes. To go back to the beginning, on the DRE testing, while I am cognizant of Ms. Treacy's comments questioning the utility of videotaping things like the taking of blood pressure, pulse, and body temperature—some of the components involved i

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  The main concern raised within the criminal justice section involving the instruments or the machines was focused on what's happening at the time an accused person is being tested on the machine. This takes on a much greater importance when that person is later restricted from be

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  I apologize, Mr. Bagnell. At the time you were asking your question I was contemplating some notes I had written about something Ms. Treacy said. I would just ask you to repeat that for me.

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  No, that's not the way the criminal justice section sees it. Indeed, in my deep contemplation of moments ago, I was taking a couple of notes. What Ms. Treacy had spoken about was some testing that, let's say, is suggestive of a central nervous system stimulant, and then there's c

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod

Justice committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Having a first name that's a common last name often results in my being referred to as Mr. Mitchell. For the record, I'll say that actually MacLeod is my last name. I would echo Ms. Thomson's comments with regard to both appreciating the opportunity to shar

June 12th, 2007Committee meeting

Mitchell MacLeod