Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee Yes, we would have that in crude oil and other flammable liquids, and there's a working group in place with industry, first responders, and municipalities to look at what would be needed in those ERAPs to ensure that the firefighters can properly respond to an incident.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee The shippers and the importers are the holders of the plan. We are also looking at whether some carriers should be responsible for some plans. Those are all policy decisions that will be looked at in the next couple of weeks.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee That's why emergency response assistance plans are there. They're industry-owned, and they're basically there to help first responders answer and properly respond to an incident.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee They would be totally different, yes.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee For crude oil, there's no emergency response assistance plan in place.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee Every time we do a risk assessment, one of the criteria is a high-density area. We looked at that as part of our risk assessment in terms of determining if there's a need for regulatory amendments or not.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee When we look at amendments to regulations, we do ask. Provinces, territories, and municipalities are part of the minister's advisory council that I participate in with the chair, and they have a chance to voice their concern and comment on whether this requirement should go ahead
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee This is not part of....
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee What we are doing right now is...after the protective direction came out...we have plans now to go in and inspect and take enforcement action if the classification is not done.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee Yes, it's properly classified. You can classify under three packing groups, packing group I being the most dangerous or highly risky and packing group III meaning the ones that are less risky. So depending on how you classify, it has to come under packing group I, II, or III. Wh
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee What is happening right now is that following the protective direction and a letter sent by the administration in the U.S., we are actually refocusing some of our inspections and doing it together, the U.S. and Canada, to focus on how products are classified in Canada and in the
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee There's a flashpoint and there's volatility. There are some types that are the thickest type of petroleum crude coming out of some of the soil that they've expected would not be classified as a dangerous good, but most of them, right now, are classified as dangerous goods.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee The directive asks that every shipment be tested and classified before it's put on rail. On the other hand, any product that would be tested and classified would be able to be shipped by rail. There's no product that wouldn't be able to be shipped by rail.
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee No. The current regulation requires that every dangerous good that is transported needs to be tested, so that's not true. The other part of the order, or protective direction, does state that if the product has not been tested, it needs to be tested and be put in the highest hi
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais
Transport committee One of the first components in the transportation of dangerous goods is classification. Dangerous goods are classified under nine classes: explosive, gases, flammable liquids, oxidizers, poisonous substances, infectious substances, radioactive material, corrosive substances, and
November 27th, 2013Committee meeting
Marie-France Dagenais