Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee Yes, that's right, on the open market.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee Perhaps, but that's not my motivation.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee Yes, for a very simple reason—
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee Yes, but look at our accomplishments: they're way wider than two or three members. What we're saying is that the status quo would be preferable because, as it stands right now, the national interest land mass is overseen by Treasury Board, which is a committee of cabinet that ha
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee That's right.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee No, I agree exactly with what he says. I would prefer to amend the bill. If you read our brief, that's what we're saying: we can amend this bill. But if you're asking me about the bill passing unamended versus having the status quo, I would prefer the status quo.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee I don't know; I don't work in real estate. Believe me, I've spent eight and a half years on this file. I've done the work of the environmentalists, the bureaucrats, and the politicians. If I were motivated by a pecuniary incentive, I would admit to it, first of all. But no, I'm
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee It's because of Treasury Board representation.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee I will answer your question—
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee Thank you, Mr. Nadeau. In fact, it's not entirely correct to say that only 2% of the park belongs to private residents. If you look at a map of the private residences inside the park, you'll see that they clog up all the infrastructure around Kingsmere Lake, Meech Lake, the boat
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee I think they should tell Parliament. If you look at the documents that were put out during the NCC's boundary rationalization exercise, they said they couldn't talk to the public about it because it would increase land speculation. That was their excuse. Well, I'm sorry, it's a n
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee Well, if you build a--
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee That's right, and that's still in the park, and the NCC will tell you it's not. So that's what we mean by “shady”: it's not transparent, it's not upfront.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray
Transport committee But there's not parliamentary oversight, and you should be asking for parliamentary oversight. You have a fiduciary and financial responsibility to your electors and all Canadians.
October 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jean-Paul Murray