Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-11 of 11
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  What I would say is that intellectual property becomes fundamental to a knowledge economy. We can do a lot of other things well, which don't touch on it; certainly our natural resource sector is.... I mean, there's a certain amount of intellectual property protection, obviously n

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes, absolutely. Canada is now seen as a bit of an outlier by some, and they are anxious to see us demonstrate our commitment to international obligations and to international standards.

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I have to say that among my members I don't represent educational institutions, I don't represent students. I have members who are both holders of copyright and members who are ISPs. I have members who are broadcasters, who are distributors. So I have a range, but not in the educ

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We tried a digital levy on recordable CDs in the 1998 legislation. I think that experience demonstrated that you just don't know where things are going. Technology is evolving so rapidly, and I suspect that anything you do is probably going to be overtaken fairly quickly by techn

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  By the way, I might add as a footnote to your quotation that the information highway advisory council was chaired by the president of the University of Waterloo, one David Johnston, who gave us that report.

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Mr. Angus, you have some good examples of how times have changed. I think in the area of software engineering, for many Canadian companies you have the necessity to not only establish their innovation and get it to market but also to secure a market share that's adequate before t

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Yes, I think WIPO is the minimum standard that we need to have.

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  There is no need to respond to that kind of speech. It wasn't a question; it was a statement. I am from another world. I am from a world where the economy is important, where people who are trying to create jobs have points of view that reflect a concern for innovation and disse

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I certainly hope that is not the case.

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Mr. Rodriguez, I don't think anyone can say with certainty that there will be losses in terms of compensation. That is why there is a five-year review process. As I mentioned, I was around when the Copyright Act was amended in 1998. During the debate, both parties made a lot of

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. It's nice to be back. I will read a brief statement and then I will go into the questions. The Canadian Council of Chief Executives, which I lead, has a long history of support for measures to strengthen Canada's economy and to promote innovat

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

John Manley