Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-5 of 5

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We would have to see what those changes were before commenting on them. But in our submission, you either take it out completely or curtail it in such a way that you ensure that it's not going to be abused. Our submission on that is to have a number of points to really ensure i

February 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Paul Taylor

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  No. I'd say it's based on the actual experience of talking to Canadians, particularly in the younger age group. They have a completely different attitude than we do as industry insiders who have seen the actual effects of the theft that's going on. The people I see outside the in

February 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Paul Taylor

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  We're essentially in agreement with that approach. We recognize that notice and notice just isn't a sufficient solution to address the problem we now have in society. People really don't seem to be aware, or they seem to justify what they're doing, and they don't really regard it

February 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Paul Taylor

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  I don't believe we have any statistics.

February 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Paul Taylor

Bill C-32 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session) committee  On technical protection measures, we support the bill's strong protection for TPMs, both access control and copy control, without which new business models like Netflix would not be possible in Canada. Allowing TPMs to be broken for private purposes or other non-infringing uses w

February 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Paul Taylor