Foreign Affairs committee  If I may, no, this is money that's not necessarily in our reference levels, but it's available to us for exactly that reason, so it doesn't create challenges for our other ongoing programs or an undue burden. There could be some money available in our frozen allotments, but the

Foreign Affairs committee  We had it in our reference levels, yes.

Foreign Affairs committee  I'd be delighted to. For the operating vote, Vote 1, the department in 2012-13 lapsed at $123.4 million, and that was reported in the public accounts. That's broken down. Simply to provide some additional context, $21 million of that was what we refer to as “special purpose allo

Foreign Affairs committee  Not quite.

Foreign Affairs committee  Well, the net lapse on the operating expenditures, which include a carry-forward of $67 million, was $85 million. Of that, $67 million is the carry-forward into the current fiscal year from last year. So the net amount after that is actually $20 million, and then that $20 million

Foreign Affairs committee  Right.

Foreign Affairs committee  No, so the—

Foreign Affairs committee  No, it was $123.4 million in vote 1, then in the grants and contributions it was $150 million, and the majority of that or a good chunk was assessed contributions to international organizations where the assessments came in a lot lower than we had expected.

Foreign Affairs committee  Well, we couldn't in fact spend it.

Foreign Affairs committee  I've got it broken down here.

Foreign Affairs committee  Right. So essentially there was no lapse in the operating expenditures, when you break it down along the lines—

Foreign Affairs committee  The $123.4 million was the total lapse.

Foreign Affairs committee  Unspent. Of which...we break it down to the various buckets—

Foreign Affairs committee  The way I would characterize it, it's $300 million that we actually—

Foreign Affairs committee  Assessments, as an example, for international organizations was less than—