Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. It's a good remark from Mr. Housefather. Indeed, the amounts were not adopted, so maybe a subamendment could be brought forward to rectify the situation if that's at all possible.

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, if I may, I would agree with Mr. Housefather.

Canadian Heritage committee  I think Mr. Julian had the same idea. We should vote on the subamendment first and then the amendment, as amended, after.

Canadian Heritage committee  If BQ-1 is adopted, NDP-3, PV-1 and CPC-4 cannot be moved due to line conflicts.

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm not quite sure myself, so would Mr. Julian like to reiterate? I'm not sure if you want to go through all the amendments that are in the package one at a time and then come back to each clause. Is that it?

Canadian Heritage committee  I'm just thinking about the possible consequences once we go through all the amendments and adopt the clauses, I suppose, one after the other. Let's say we go through the whole package of amendments and go back to clause 1. Is that to simply adopt clause 1, possibly as amended, o

Canadian Heritage committee  Madam Chair, can I just—

Canadian Heritage committee  I'm not sure I understood what Mr. Julian wants to do, but I think it would require unanimous consent to do that. It would—

Environment committee  Mr. Chair, we need to address clause 1 first.

Environment committee  No, Mr. Chair. We have to go to clause 1.

Agriculture committee  Yes, it would be basically to rescind the decision that the committee made on amendment LIB-2, so to speak, and, with unanimous consent, to do that through amendment CPC-2.

Agriculture committee  No, no, no.

Agriculture committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. With every problem, there's always a solution, as we say. When the committee voted on amendment LIB-2, it voted against an eight-year sunset clause for proposed subclause 2(1). Now you can't go back and say you want it, so that's the problem. The solutio

Agriculture committee  Yes.

Agriculture committee  That's correct.