Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 64
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  From our perspective everything is here. Maybe in a couple of years Canada will want to move further, but for the time being, everything is here.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  What we have a direct interest in is strictly part 4, the one on the implementation of the HNS convention. For the other parts we have only an indirect interest; we are not experts on that. Basically our submission is that part 4 move forward and that it become part of Canadian l

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  I would say that, from our standpoint, Canada is overdue to be able to ratify the HNS convention and implement it because it's the first building block of the system. I might be afraid that this would be pushed back. Waiting to have a whole regime after the tanker panel finishes

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  Under the conventions, yes, a shipowner's liability is capped. Then you have this international fund that is capped as well, so, if you don't have enough money, what do you do? Well, it's not in the convention; it is for each country to decide what they will do. One solution is,

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  Yes, and also, remember that if over time, say 10 years from now, the international community, including all the signatory states, believe that this limit should be upgraded, there are provisions in the conventions to do that quickly.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  No, I don't have any knowledge of such a big spill that would have happened. So what we know is that this limit hasn't been reached and is far from having been reached yet.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  From an international shipowner's perspective, I guess it would have an indirect effect in terms of response in case of a spill at the terminal. But for us it's something that is indirect, and we didn't comment on that in our letter because it's not our direct liability or respon

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  That question is for me?

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  Yes, that's the case.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  It will be on a ship-by-ship basis. Each ship will have its own insurance and it will cover up to the limits of liability of the convention on civil liability for ships, which is currently incorporated via part 3 of the Marine Liability Act, because in shipping matters the liabil

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  Without C-3 it will depend on the size of the ship because it's on a tonnage basis.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars

Transport committee  I would have to go back to it because you have a gradation depending on the size, so it's kind of complicated, but I can send you a table after this hearing. It's lower than the HNS convention.

February 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Anne Legars