Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 18
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The Canada Elections Act provides a number of options to prove your identity and your residence. If it were just one piece of ID, you'd need the name, address, and photo—and really that's the driver's licence, which is provided by the provinces. There's another option, where yo

March 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I was just going to add that one of the positive aspects of the pre-registration is that it could be used as a fairly concrete call to action when Elections Canada does conduct civic education activities with youth in high schools so that there's something they can do to be part

March 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  No, I don't, other than to say that the final report has been published on the website.

February 7th, 2017Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's just a clarificatory amendment. It does specify copies, because in most cases when you're mailing in your documents, it would be by a copy.

May 28th, 2015Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I imagine it would depend on provincial rules around what happens to companies after that sort of event arises, or on federal rules around such a case. There would be someone who would be responsible as part of that company, but we're not aware.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Well, the party that would be entering into an agreement with the calling service provider would be.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In terms of the political entities involved or the third parties involved, there's generally a connection to Canada.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The political entities...? Definitely. The third parties, so long as they're not incurring expenses to a certain limit....

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In general, there can still be territorial jurisdiction in Canada over an offence where part of that offence happens in Canada. So in the case of calls, for example, the person receiving the call would be in Canada, and that would form part of the offence, so the territorial prin

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I believe it would. The CRTC gave examples where they had presented notices of offences against calling service providers outside of Canada. But in the case of the fair elections act, the political entities or the third parties would have to be Canadian, or connected to Canada so

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The only thing I would add is that under the government information retention management policy, there would be obligations in terms of publishing information banks, and that sort of thing, with the retention period played out according to types of information. Maybe that's what

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Under section 18.1—I believe it is—the CEO has full contracting authority. Section 20, subsection (1), is what provides that special personal services contracting authority, which is subject to Treasury Board approval to fix and pay the rates of pay. So that is something where th

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The audit is not defined here or in the act. It's used in other places, for example, for political financing and returns, and audits of standards that should be used in terms of generally accepted auditing practices and standards. In terms of the scope of it, it's not set out h

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  There was a precedent in the Canada Elections Act actually, so this same section, subsection 161(1) already existed in the act. It was an oral notification, oral advising about the oath, but this is more clear in terms of the scope of what that advice should be, so it essentially

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Procedure and House Affairs committee  We'll try to answer some of those questions in order. If you look at government amendment G-5, subparagraph (b) that's being proposed, it essentially says that they are attesting to the elector's residence on oath in writing in the prescribed form and then sets out some elements

April 30th, 2014Committee meeting

Natasha Kim