Justice committee  We were concerned about the implications specifically for young people. There needs to be some kind of ceiling set. The language of the provisions seems to be open-ended. We were concerned, for example, in the case of young people who may be involved in educational pursuits if th

Justice committee  Recklessness, but it—

Justice committee  Well, I see that the recklessness standard, as we have indicated in our brief, could create certain problems where there isn't the clear intent to bully. We identify a couple of case examples, such as where an individual provides a laptop to a friend and there may be some embedde

Justice committee  You're transmitting the imagery to the friend.

Justice committee  I'm saying that in terms of the boyfriend, this is not something that's being done for any revenge or attempt to be punitive towards the girlfriend.

Justice committee  I'm not talking about the recipient. I'm talking about the boyfriend. The boyfriend who is transmitting the images by virtue of a laptop—

Justice committee  No, but he disseminating the image to a friend and there could be some sense—

Justice committee  No. I think that what we were trying to convey as well is the...

Justice committee  Those provisions under the Youth Criminal Justice Act would continue to apply. I think the point that we were trying to emphasize is that there is a way of strengthening some of the provisions in Bill C-13, so that we don't inadvertently catch certain young people or certain indi

Justice committee  Thank you. UNICEF appreciates the opportunity to present to this committee, so thank you very much. We see Bill C-13 as one step in the right direction. We certainly commend the work of the Coordinating Committee of Senior Officials Cybercrime Working Group, which delivered it