Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Justice committee I don't think there are. I think it can be said that some sentences have been pointed out as being at the low end of the spectrum, given some of the treatment, but I don't think increasing the available sentence is going to necessarily cure that, given that there aren't comment
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Under the most charitable view, I think you could be correct. Given the realities of what people know about the Criminal Code—which I brought with me, and I'm not a strong man; it's heavy in one hand—I think that if you presume that everyone knows what's in here, both the offende
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee I would expect so, because these are complex issues. These are complex agreements. Even when committees and Parliament are dealing with other criminal law issues, the thing about criminal law changes is that small changes can have tentacles that touch a wide variety of issues, an
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee I couldn't disagree that it would make it somewhat more consistent with the other measures.
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Yes, and I don't want to overstate that point. This isn't a charge that I expect would be laid disproportionately in a large number of cases. We're not dealing with a theft under...or impaired driving, or something like that. These are sort of extraordinary occurrences that aren'
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee It would be fairly rare, but you can expect there would likely be a number of challenges to the first charges laid, and I would expect to see this provision, given the conflicts inherent in it and the other section and the issues of statutory interpretation, being brought before
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Yes.
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee It wouldn't. It would remove one of those conflicts between the existing provision and this bill. It wouldn't address the other legal and statutory interpretation conflicts that I've identified. My understanding is that one of the reasons this bill was put forward was specifica
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Thank you very much. It's an honour, and a privilege to appear before this committee. I notice that I'm here alone in the hot seat with no one beside me, which is good because I don't have any written submission. I would welcome any oral questions, and I'll try to be as detaile
September 29th, 2016Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Of course you're taking it out of context—
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee As you know, there are ranges to all offences. There are some that are very serious and some that are less serious. The problem with minimum sentences is that they treat less serious offences the same as a more serious offence, and in doing so they discard some very important pri
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee If you actually go back and look at the sentencing research, you see that to a large extent courts do impose consecutive sentences a large majority of the time. One of the other witnesses was testifying and using a sort of banal example of multiple offences against mailboxes. If
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee If I may, just very briefly, when we look at the most serious and the most heinous cases, we're not talking about 90 days or six months for those. Routinely there are very lengthy sentences for those cases. But when we're looking at reasonable hypotheticals from a constitutional
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee Briefly, denunciation is but one of the principles of sentencing. The problem with bills like this and with mandatory sentences is that they put too much weight on that principle, and in an unconstitutional way. There's a fallacy in the logic that was employed in the question. T
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt
Justice committee The minimums are already there. Whether the minimums work or not, I guess there can be some debate. You can't really debate the evidence. The problem with saying we're just increasing what's already there is that the minimums that are already there are barely passing constitutio
February 16th, 2015Committee meeting
Michael Spratt