Industry committee  No. Netflix is different. Netflix is more like our video-on-demand service, where we have negotiated rights and you as an individual haven't decided to record something. Under the current Copyright Act, you are entitled to record something on your own device or on a network.

Industry committee  Yes, it's absolutely intended that you would have some designated amount of storage space in the cloud that you chose to purchase in the same way that the box that you've chosen had a specific size of storage space for your PVR. You would have, in the network, a similar size so t

Industry committee  Under the act presently, in order to avoid liability as a network provider, we would have to store an individual copy. For each person who records, we store that individual copy. We're suggesting that's extremely inefficient, and it would require excessive duplication of memory

Industry committee  Yes, and I might ask Antoine to take that question.

Industry committee  We're not suggesting supplanting the whole video on demand mechanism. We are a video-on-demand provider, and we hope that people will continue to purchase things on video on demand as well. With regard to the current right that exists for personal use to record, to the extent t

Industry committee  For us, yes. We might pass those costs along.

Industry committee  I wouldn't say no capacity, but it's not an area that we've generally gone to at this point.

Industry committee  All we can do is verify the information that's provided to us by the rights holder. That includes the time, date and IP address of the downloads. When all that information is accurate, we forward the notice, and we're obligated to do so. I can understand it's a concern for user

Industry committee  Innovation and disruption do go hand in hand. We certainly believe in balance. The idea is not to balance only in favour of network operators, for example, but rather to ensure that we have the right legislative framework in place to promote innovation to the benefit of rights ho

Industry committee  Yes, it has. The examples we've provided were, for example, the NPVR, and other areas where we've been looking at different means of providing notices in order to attempt to address some of the concerns raised by Mr. Albas and Mr. Angus. These are the types of things we're cons

Industry committee  I think every ISP will have different means and different degrees of what's commonly called a deep packet inspection. Not all ISPs do that kind of work. To the extent that those vary in degrees, I would say that Telus is very much at the low end of that. There's very little abili

Industry committee  For example, there's the NPVR; for example, there are new business models, which, as we mentioned with respect to notice and notice.... I'm trying to think of innovation on a more general perspective, but when we talk about notice and notice, we'd like automation, and more automa

Industry committee  Absolutely.

Industry committee  No, because in the instances of disproportionate damage, it's more about the risk of innovation not coming to market because of that fear, the idea being that under the act there is no limit. It means that if we decide to implement something that ultimately ends up being non-co

Industry committee  It certainly is, on many fronts, whether you're looking at piracy or this notion that there are copyright infringement notices that are fraudulent or that are being abused for whatever reason, through phishing exercises, which cause security concerns. I think there are definitely