Citizenship and Immigration committee  I guess we could presume that the same vigour isn't present in this system. That's why they're not falling—

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It is not sufficiently mandated. That would be my response.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I believe it would be.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Based on what you're saying, I would choose the law society.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I hear your argument.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I think the point that makes this reasonable is that these individuals have no way of identifying what they need in an immigration consultant and they're very vulnerable and afraid of rocking the boat.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  So this is unique in that respect. Then we're holding them accountable and documentation expires and they leave the country. There really is something wrong with that.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  There are instances of that for sure, yes.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Hence, you need an oversight body to determine who should and who shouldn't be a consultant.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's just what I've listed here: very specific, very clear admission and accreditation requirements; code of standards and rules, and when they violate those, there's a repercussion; what the scope of practice should and shouldn't cover; what they defer to settlement services; th

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Okay.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Exactly. Again, it shouldn't happen. There should be a policy around who can fill in what document, who can sign what document, who can give direct advice.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Yes.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Definitely.

Citizenship and Immigration committee  As Jenny pointed out, a stepped-fee system would be great, for certain milestones.