Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 60
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  That's absolutely true—

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  —but we do need to know where it is.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  Also, we need to monitor it, because some of it will be a hazard, and all of it will be a hazard if it's disrupted or handled in the wrong way.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  That's right.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  I have to admit that I'm not terribly familiar with the other example. I think part of what you touched on, though, or what I heard, is that we shouldn't be rushing to the conclusion that there should be a national project to go out and get this out of everywhere it exists.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  Do you mean that already exist—

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  —and are already on cars?

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  There is definitely going to be a period when those products can no longer be legally bought, traded, exported, imported, or used. They'll be completely phased out of the system. There will be some that are already either on cars or you'll have inventory that an auto body shop wi

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  Yes—not all of it, for sure.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  That's great. Thank you.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  Yes, I think so. I'm not sure the language is exactly the same as what I'd use, but I think that the underlying point you're trying to make is one we would agree with for sure.

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller

Environment committee  I don't think I can give you a specific answer. The way you framed it is interesting. The big project being worked on right now on the economic burden of occupational cancers looks at the associated costs, but it deals only with the costs of cancers from past exposure, and then

November 17th, 2016Committee meeting

Gabriel Miller