Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-13 of 13
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  Sure. The only criterion that applies to Senate bills is whether the bill is essentially the same as one already voted on by the House of Commons in the current session. I didn't find any similar bill that has been voted on.

June 13th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

May 4th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  Do you want to explain the procedure to get the royal recommendation?

May 4th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  The only item I wish to comment on is Bill C-344. You may have noticed that Bill C-344 is essentially the same as another bill, Bill C-227, which was struck from the Order Paper on January 31. I understand that this bill was dropped from the Order Paper not because of the substan

May 4th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

May 4th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  Thank you. Today you have two bills to look at. First is Bill S-230, which is a Senate bill. For the Senate bill, I want to remind the committee that the only criterion that applies is that no similar bills have been voted on by the House during the current session. I've looked

March 20th, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  In fact, the rule is to determine whether or not those two bills seek to achieve the same things in the same way. I know that Bill C-37 is a bit broader. It includes more substance, but it tries to achieve the same thing in the same way. It's just the scope of it. The scope of C-

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  Right, it's the exact same section. It's really just the scope of it. The government would include all of the scheduled substances, whereas Bill C-324 would only add a few substances to the prohibition.

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  Personally, I don't know. I didn't talk with Mr. Saroya.

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  I don't know if I have to go through all of the list, but there is one item that I want to bring to your attention. It's item 13, Bill C-324. This bill is similar to another bill that was tabled by the government, Bill C-37. The objective of Bill C-324 is to prohibit the posse

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business committee  I can let the clerk discuss the rules, but yes, I think he would be able to propose another item.

February 2nd, 2017Committee meeting

Alexandre Lavoie