Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-13 of 13
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  It's the same in Prince Rupert. The big NGOs and others are there, certainly with our project.

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Yes. We are directed by government as to which first nations require “big C” consultations, and those are the Tsimshian peoples along the coast and up to Terrace. We have agreements with all six of them, some confidential and some not. We do have agreements with all Tsimshian. Th

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  I didn't know they weren't designated in Rupert. There are certainly routes that all the boats come in on. The pilots bring them in. Then there's the inland one for the ferries. I thought they were designated. I'm pretty sure they are, actually.

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  How much has the government talked with us? Well, it was weekly working groups for awhile and then it got into monthly working groups. In the entire environmental assessment process, yes, it's working groups and all of the agencies.

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Yes. A lot of the work that we've done was not requested. We've mapped all of the marine vegetation in the southern Chatham Sound and have set up a process so that you only need to take a satellite photo once a year and then monitor the growth and expansion or loss of marine vege

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  No, all of our reports are submitted as part of the environmental assessment process, including others like the marine vegetation one. What they haven't asked for, and therefore don't have, is the raw data. That can go into other uses. Our reports just come to a conclusion. They

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Yes. It's a big country, so 120 or 160 scientists....

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  If you were in Prince Rupert, you'd notice that the DFO building has echoes and things like that. They have folks working out of Nanaimo. I think they're understaffed along the entire coast—and probably in all of Canada. The science that is out there is from the 1970s. DFO did

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Absolutely. I've already provided all of ours to the Pacific Salmon Foundation and to the Vancouver Aquarium. It's raw data. You just ask for it. Right now what you get are finished reports. The raw data is available.

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Right now, Prince Rupert has three navigation channels coming in. That's what everyone makes their plans on to get out to Triple Island and have safe passage. To date, we don't believe any marine protected areas are affecting that. It's just the feature.

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  I don't have a sense of a lot of significant work being done in applied science, insofar as how projects could affect habitat is concerned. There may be science out there, I understand, in a lot of the offshore stuff, but frankly the information available on Chatham Sound itself

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  No. DFO, Fisheries and Oceans, asked us to study all the fish, all the age classes, all the habitats in Chatham Sound, because they all contribute to the commercial, recreational, and aboriginal fisheries. So you can say they just target those fisheries, but they depend on ever

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark

Fisheries committee  Thank you. On behalf of Pacific NorthWest LNG—the acronym is liquefied natural gas—I'd like to thank the committee for this opportunity. In my past life I was a director of BC Parks and I'm on the board of directors of the Nature Trust of British Columbia, so I appreciate the

June 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Brian Clark